Currently, the logic for skipping the read range for a write is
if (!(iter->flags & IOMAP_UNSHARE) &&
(from <= poff || from >= poff + plen) &&
(to <= poff || to >= poff + plen))
which breaks down to skipping the read if any of these are true:
a) from <= poff && to <= poff
b) from <= poff && to >= poff + plen
c) from >= poff + plen && to <= poff
d) from >= poff + plen && to >= poff + plen
This can be simplified to
if (!(iter->flags & IOMAP_UNSHARE) && from <= poff && to >= poff + plen)
from the following reasoning:
a) from <= poff && to <= poff
This reduces to 'to <= poff' since it is guaranteed that 'from <= to'
(since to = from + len). It is not possible for 'from <= to' to be true
here because we only reach here if plen > 0 (thanks to the preceding 'if
(plen == 0)' check that would break us out of the loop). If 'to <=
poff', plen would have to be 0 since poff and plen get adjusted in
lockstep for uptodate blocks. This means we can eliminate this check.
c) from >= poff + plen && to <= poff
This is not possible since 'from <= to' and 'plen > 0'. We can eliminate
this check.
d) from >= poff + plen && to >= poff + plen
This reduces to 'from >= poff + plen' since 'from <= to'.
It is not possible for 'from >= poff + plen' to be true here. We only
reach here if plen > 0 and for writes, poff and plen will always be
block-aligned, which means poff <= from < poff + plen. We can eliminate
this check.
The only valid check is b) from <= poff && to >= poff + plen.
Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251111193658.3495942-7-joannelkoong@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>