Corrected number in GNUTLS_PSK_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256.

RFC6367 seems to have assigned both {0xC0,0x8D} and {0xC0,0x8E} to this
ciphersuite. However {0xC0,0x8D} should be a typo as it is used by another
ciphersuite in the same document.

diff --git a/lib/algorithms/ciphersuites.c b/lib/algorithms/ciphersuites.c
index c730640c4ea8b712b8ecef287f192b2bfffc659d..03b2118fcc6a147c7a5daf70f4723c14e7530b79 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/algorithms/ciphersuites.c
+++ b/lib/algorithms/ciphersuites.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ typedef struct
 #define GNUTLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384  { 0xC0,0x87 }
 #define GNUTLS_ECDHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256    { 0xC0,0x8A }
 #define GNUTLS_ECDHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384    { 0xC0,0x8B }
-#define GNUTLS_PSK_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256        { 0xC0,0x8D }
+#define GNUTLS_PSK_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256        { 0xC0,0x8E }
 #define GNUTLS_PSK_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384        { 0xC0,0x8F }
 #define GNUTLS_DHE_PSK_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256    { 0xC0,0x90 }
 #define GNUTLS_DHE_PSK_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384    { 0xC0,0x91 }