--- /dev/null
+From a5bff92eaac45bdf6221badf9505c26792fdf99e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
+Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 15:30:02 +0200
+Subject: dma-buf: Fix SET_NAME ioctl uapi
+
+From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
+
+commit a5bff92eaac45bdf6221badf9505c26792fdf99e upstream.
+
+The uapi is the same on 32 and 64 bit, but the number isn't. Everyone
+who botched this please re-read:
+
+https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.4-preprc-cpu/ioctl/botching-up-ioctls.html
+
+Also, the type argument for the ioctl macros is for the type the void
+__user *arg pointer points at, which in this case would be the
+variable-sized char[] of a 0 terminated string. So this was botched in
+more than just the usual ways.
+
+Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
+Cc: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com>
+Cc: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
+Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
+Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
+Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
+Cc: minchan@kernel.org
+Cc: surenb@google.com
+Cc: jenhaochen@google.com
+Cc: Martin Liu <liumartin@google.com>
+Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
+Tested-by: Martin Liu <liumartin@google.com>
+Reviewed-by: Martin Liu <liumartin@google.com>
+Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
+ [sumits: updated some checkpatch fixes, corrected author email]
+Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200407133002.3486387-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+
+---
+ drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 3 ++-
+ include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 6 ++++++
+ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
++++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+@@ -388,7 +388,8 @@ static long dma_buf_ioctl(struct file *f
+
+ return ret;
+
+- case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME:
++ case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A:
++ case DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B:
+ return dma_buf_set_name(dmabuf, (const char __user *)arg);
+
+ default:
+--- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
++++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h
+@@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ struct dma_buf_sync {
+
+ #define DMA_BUF_BASE 'b'
+ #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync)
++
++/* 32/64bitness of this uapi was botched in android, there's no difference
++ * between them in actual uapi, they're just different numbers.
++ */
+ #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *)
++#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32)
++#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64)
+
+ #endif