SF #829941, update tutorial, built-in types can be base classes since 2.2

diff --git a/Doc/tut/tut.tex b/Doc/tut/tut.tex
index 661ac206da8d39446ebb4e4b828b8174896f893a..742a3af0ecf4521c35a7855fccf58ea335b6e704 100644 (file)
--- a/Doc/tut/tut.tex
+++ b/Doc/tut/tut.tex
@@ -3541,8 +3541,8 @@ method function is declared with an explicit first argument
 representing the object, which is provided implicitly by the call.  As
 in Smalltalk, classes themselves are objects, albeit in the wider
 sense of the word: in Python, all data types are objects.  This
-provides semantics for importing and renaming.  But, just like in
-\Cpp{} or Modula-3, built-in types cannot be used as base classes for
+provides semantics for importing and renaming.  Unlike 
+\Cpp{} and Modula-3, built-in types can be used as base classes for
 extension by the user.  Also, like in \Cpp{} but unlike in Modula-3, most
 built-in operators with special syntax (arithmetic operators,
 subscripting etc.) can be redefined for class instances.