}
}
- r = sd_rtnl_message_route_set_type(req, route->type);
- if (r < 0)
- return log_link_error_errno(link, r, "Could not set route type: %m");
-
if (!route_type_is_reject(route) && route->nexthop_id == 0) {
assert(link); /* Those routes must be attached to a specific link */
link_netlink_message_handler_t callback) {
_cleanup_(sd_netlink_message_unrefp) sd_netlink_message *req = NULL;
+ unsigned char type;
int r;
assert(link || manager);
if (r < 0)
return log_link_error_errno(link, r, "Could not create RTM_DELROUTE message: %m");
+ if (route->family == AF_INET && route->nexthop_id > 0 && route->type == RTN_BLACKHOLE)
+ /* When IPv4 route has nexthop id and the nexthop type is blackhole, even though kernel
+ * sends RTM_NEWROUTE netlink message with blackhole type, kernel's internal route type
+ * fib_rt_info::type may not be blackhole. Thus, we cannot know the internal value.
+ * Moreover, on route removal, the matching is done with the hidden value if we set
+ * non-zero type in RTM_DELROUTE message. Note, sd_rtnl_message_new_route() sets
+ * RTN_UNICAST by default. So, we need to clear the type here. */
+ type = RTN_UNSPEC;
+ else
+ type = route->type;
+
+ r = sd_rtnl_message_route_set_type(req, type);
+ if (r < 0)
+ return log_link_error_errno(link, r, "Could not set route type: %m");
+
r = route_set_netlink_message(route, req, link);
if (r < 0)
return r;
if (r < 0)
return log_link_error_errno(link, r, "Could not create RTM_NEWROUTE message: %m");
+ r = sd_rtnl_message_route_set_type(req, route->type);
+ if (r < 0)
+ return log_link_error_errno(link, r, "Could not set route type: %m");
+
r = route_set_netlink_message(route, req, link);
if (r < 0)
return r;