GH-96359: Fix docs that claim int(0|1) doesn't match False (GH-96361)

(cherry picked from commit 3d3a86ed40626471b2c9e7f1336b228eb0dd0879)

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Oberländer <github@l3vi.de>

diff --git a/Doc/reference/compound_stmts.rst b/Doc/reference/compound_stmts.rst
index 93c1720220f0439d2fb172c1db184888aefea2e4..751c7c2dbcf257366fe853217a83b58549896c87 100644 (file)
--- a/Doc/reference/compound_stmts.rst
+++ b/Doc/reference/compound_stmts.rst
@@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ subject value:
 
    These classes accept a single positional argument, and the pattern there is matched
    against the whole object rather than an attribute. For example ``int(0|1)`` matches
-   the value ``0``, but not the values ``0.0`` or ``False``.
+   the value ``0``, but not the value ``0.0``.
 
 In simple terms ``CLS(P1, attr=P2)`` matches only if the following happens: