Some of the following testcases are incorrectly accepted.
The problem is in convert_nontype_argument. It just does
maybe_constant_value earlier. Later on for integral/enum/floating
point args it uses cxx_constant_value for complain & tf_error if
not val_dep_p and expr is not a simple constant, similarly for
class type it calls
/* Replace the argument with a reference to the corresponding template
parameter object. */
if (!val_dep_p)
expr = create_template_parm_object (expr, complain);
if (expr == error_mark_node)
return NULL_TREE;
etc. But for NULLPTR_TYPE_P and REFLECTION_TYPE_P cases (I bet
Marek has based the latter on the former) it only verifies the type
and not the actual expression.
I think we need to do that, because if maybe_constant_value fails, it
just returns the passed in argument and if nothing checks it, we accept
whatever was there (and sometimes ICE later).
The following patch implements that.
2026-02-19 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/124070
* pt.cc (convert_nontype_argument): For NULLPTR_TYPE_P case
if expr is not integer_zerop and is not val_dep_p try harder,
for complain & tf_error use cxx_constant_value and return NULL_TREE
for error_mark_node, without tf_error return NULL_TREE. Similarly
for REFLECTION_TYPE_P case if expr is not REFLECT_EXPR and is not
val_dep_p try harder like for NULLPTR_TYPE_P.
* g++.dg/cpp26/pr124070.C: New test.
* g++.dg/reflect/parameters_of4.C: Expect different diagnostics.
* g++.dg/reflect/define_aggregate7.C: New test.
* g++.dg/reflect/define_aggregate8.C: New test.
"because it is of type %qT", expr, type, TREE_TYPE (expr));
return NULL_TREE;
}
+ if (!integer_zerop (expr) && !val_dep_p)
+ {
+ if (complain & tf_error)
+ {
+ expr = cxx_constant_value (expr);
+ if (expr == error_mark_node)
+ return NULL_TREE;
+ gcc_assert (integer_zerop (expr));
+ }
+ else
+ return NULL_TREE;
+ }
return expr;
}
else if (CLASS_TYPE_P (type))
"because it is of type %qT", expr, type, TREE_TYPE (expr));
return NULL_TREE;
}
+ if (!REFLECT_EXPR_P (expr) && !val_dep_p)
+ {
+ if (complain & tf_error)
+ {
+ expr = cxx_constant_value (expr);
+ if (expr == error_mark_node)
+ return NULL_TREE;
+ gcc_assert (REFLECT_EXPR_P (expr));
+ }
+ else
+ return NULL_TREE;
+ }
return expr;
}
/* A template non-type parameter must be one of the above. */
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/124070
+// { dg-do compile { target c++26 } }
+
+constexpr decltype (nullptr)
+bar (bool x)
+{
+ if (x)
+ throw 1;
+ return nullptr;
+}
+
+template <decltype (nullptr) I = bar (true)> // { dg-error "uncaught exception '1'" }
+constexpr void
+foo ()
+{
+}
+
+consteval {
+ foo <> (); // { dg-error "no matching function for call to 'foo<>\\\(\\\)'" }
+}
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/124070
+// { dg-do compile { target c++26 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-freflection" }
+
+#include <meta>
+
+struct S;
+template <std::meta::info I = define_aggregate (^^S, {})> // { dg-error "'define_aggregate' not evaluated from 'consteval' block" }
+constexpr void foo () {}
+
+consteval {
+ foo <> (); // { dg-error "no matching function for call to 'foo<>\\\(\\\)'" }
+}
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/124070
+// { dg-do compile { target c++26 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-freflection" }
+
+#include <meta>
+
+struct S;
+consteval void bar (std::meta::info a = define_aggregate (^^S, {})) {}
+consteval {
+ bar ();
+}
+S s;
#include <meta>
-template<auto R> void foo () {} // { dg-message "sorry, unimplemented: mangling" }
+template<auto R> void foo () {}
void
g ()
{
- foo<std::meta::parameters_of(^^g)[0]>();
+ foo<std::meta::parameters_of(^^g)[0]>(); // { dg-error "no matching function for call to" }
}
+// { dg-error "call to non-'constexpr' function" "" { target *-*-* } 0 }