So far we handled immediate "no server" query results differently from
"no server" results we ran into during operation: the former would cause
the dns_query_go() call to fail with ESRCH, the later would result in
the query completion callback to be called.
Remove the duplicate codepaths, by always going through the completion
callback. This allows us to remove quite a number of lines for handling
the ESRCH.
This commit should not alter behaviour at all.
* query, this time with the cname */
if (added <= 0) {
r = dns_query_go(q);
- if (r == -ESRCH) {
- r = sd_bus_reply_method_errorf(q->request, BUS_ERROR_NO_NAME_SERVERS, "No appropriate name servers or networks for name found");
- goto finish;
- }
if (r < 0) {
r = sd_bus_reply_method_errno(q->request, -r, NULL);
goto finish;
r = dns_query_go(q);
if (r < 0) {
dns_query_free(q);
-
- if (r == -ESRCH)
- sd_bus_error_setf(error, BUS_ERROR_NO_NAME_SERVERS, "No appropriate name servers or networks for name found");
-
return r;
}
r = dns_query_go(q);
if (r < 0) {
dns_query_free(q);
-
- if (r == -ESRCH)
- sd_bus_error_setf(error, BUS_ERROR_NO_NAME_SERVERS, "No appropriate name servers or networks for name found");
-
return r;
}
r = dns_query_go(q);
if (r < 0) {
dns_query_free(q);
-
- if (r == -ESRCH)
- sd_bus_error_setf(error, BUS_ERROR_NO_NAME_SERVERS, "No appropriate name servers or networks for name found");
-
return r;
}
DnsTransactionState state = DNS_TRANSACTION_NO_SERVERS;
dns_query_synthesize_reply(q, &state);
- if (state != DNS_TRANSACTION_NO_SERVERS) {
- dns_query_complete(q, state);
- return 1;
- }
-
- return -ESRCH;
+ dns_query_complete(q, state);
+ return 1;
}
r = dns_query_add_transaction_split(q, first);