Fix implicit conversion warnings in the period_num tests

diff --git a/src/test/test_hs_service.c b/src/test/test_hs_service.c
index 8207ddc1609155c16723fdc6c31a4029f8ba4101..fcfb3b992dd6350eeeca31606bc1754e479ebec2 100644 (file)
--- a/src/test/test_hs_service.c
+++ b/src/test/test_hs_service.c
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void
 test_time_period(void *arg)
 {
   (void) arg;
-  unsigned int tn;
+  uint64_t tn;
   int retval;
   time_t fake_time;
 
@@ -214,22 +214,22 @@ test_time_period(void *arg)
 
   /* Check that the time period number is right */
   tn = get_time_period_num(fake_time);
-  tt_int_op(tn, ==, 16903);
+  tt_u64_op(tn, ==, 16903);
 
   /* Increase current time to 11:59:59 UTC and check that the time period
      number is still the same */
   fake_time += 3599;
   tn = get_time_period_num(fake_time);
-  tt_int_op(tn, ==, 16903);
+  tt_u64_op(tn, ==, 16903);
 
   /* Now take time to 12:00:00 UTC and check that the time period rotated */
   fake_time += 1;
   tn = get_time_period_num(fake_time);
-  tt_int_op(tn, ==, 16904);
+  tt_u64_op(tn, ==, 16904);
 
   /* Now also check our hs_get_next_time_period_num() function */
   tn = hs_get_next_time_period_num(fake_time);
-  tt_int_op(tn, ==, 16905);
+  tt_u64_op(tn, ==, 16905);
 
  done:
   ;