#include "string-table.h"
#include "string-util.h"
#include "tomoyo-util.h"
+#include "tpm2-util.h"
#include "udev-util.h"
#include "uid-alloc-range.h"
#include "user-util.h"
}
static int has_tpm2(void) {
- int r;
-
/* Checks whether the system has at least one TPM2 resource manager device, i.e. at least one "tpmrm"
- * class device */
-
- r = dir_is_empty("/sys/class/tpmrm");
- if (r == 0)
- return true; /* nice! we have a device */
-
- /* Hmm, so Linux doesn't know of the TPM2 device (or we couldn't check for it), most likely because
- * the driver wasn't loaded yet. Let's see if the firmware knows about a TPM2 device, in this
- * case. This way we can answer the TPM2 question already during early boot (where we most likely
- * need it) */
- if (efi_has_tpm2())
- return true;
-
- /* OK, this didn't work either, in this case propagate the original errors */
- if (r == -ENOENT)
- return false;
- if (r < 0)
- return log_debug_errno(r, "Failed to determine whether system has TPM2 support: %m");
+ * class device. Alternatively, we are also happy if the firmware reports support (this is to cover
+ * for cases where we simply haven't loaded the driver for it yet, i.e. during early boot where we
+ * very likely want to use this condition check).
+ *
+ * Note that we don't check if we ourselves are built with TPM2 support here! */
- return !r;
+ return (tpm2_support() & (TPM2_SUPPORT_DRIVER|TPM2_SUPPORT_FIRMWARE)) != 0;
}
static int condition_test_security(Condition *c, char **env) {