gh-71141: Add note on rejecting "leading-dot" syntax for with statements (#96928)

Co-authored-by: Daniël van Noord <13665637+DanielNoord@users.noreply.github.com>

diff --git a/Doc/faq/design.rst b/Doc/faq/design.rst
index 9da1d01abd6f51b33be0c63044020d2ba8d64a44..52388fca5cdbcab7296fbffcbae7cee6530e74d0 100644 (file)
--- a/Doc/faq/design.rst
+++ b/Doc/faq/design.rst
@@ -703,6 +703,10 @@ This also has the side-effect of increasing execution speed because name
 bindings are resolved at run-time in Python, and the second version only needs
 to perform the resolution once.
 
+Similar proposals that would introduce syntax to further reduce code volume,
+such as using a 'leading dot', have been rejected in favour of explicitness (see
+https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2016-May/040070.html).
+
 
 Why don't generators support the with statement?
 ------------------------------------------------