On Intel platforms with a VMX preemption timer and APICv, if a VMM
calls KVM_GET_LAPIC before KVM_GET_MSRS to save the vCPU state, it is
possible to lose a pending timer interrupt.
If the thread running these ioctls is migrated to another core after
calling KVM_GET_LAPIC but before KVM_GET_MSRS and the guest is using
their LAPIC timer in TSC-deadline mode, not only does the save LAPIC
state not carry the pending interrupt, the TSCDEADLINE MSR will be
zeroed.
After migration across CPUs, KVM_GET_MSRS calls vcpu_load, posting the
interrupt and clearing the MSR:
vcpu_load() ->
kvm_arch_vcpu_load() ->
kvm_lapic_restart_hv_timer() ->
start_hv_timer() ->
apic_timer_expired() ->
kvm_apic_inject_pending_timer_irqs()
. post interrupt into the LAPIC state
. clear IA32_TSCDEADLINE
The saved LAPIC state will be missing the pending interrupt and the saved
MSR will be zero. Oops.
Fix by only posting an interrupt when we're attempting to enter the guest
(vcpu->wants_to_run == true), not for vcpu_load from other paths.
Assisted-by: gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview
Debugged-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Debugged-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Debugged-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Debugged-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@chromium.org>
Message-ID: <
20260715234234.15382-2-venkateshs@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: ae95f566b3d2 ("KVM: X86: TSCDEADLINE MSR emulation fastpath", 2020-05-15)
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
if (apic_lvtt_tscdeadline(apic) || ktimer->hv_timer_in_use)
ktimer->expired_tscdeadline = ktimer->tscdeadline;
- if (!from_timer_fn && apic->apicv_active) {
+ if (!from_timer_fn && apic->apicv_active && vcpu->wants_to_run) {
WARN_ON(kvm_get_running_vcpu() != vcpu);
kvm_apic_inject_pending_timer_irqs(apic);
return;