The RDTSC instruction was introduced on the Pentium line of microprocessors,

and is not compatible with certain 586 clones, like Cyrix.  Hence, asking for
i386 compatibility was always incorrect. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDTSC
(Closes issue #12886)
Reported by tecnoxarxa

git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@123869 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3

diff --git a/main/asterisk.c b/main/asterisk.c
index a5784884e719e0fb7f224a0127fc92b2ded7c6fb..17b3581f176a57778deffb8d49ac2ecdd4c2d30e 100644 (file)
--- a/main/asterisk.c
+++ b/main/asterisk.c
@@ -414,7 +414,10 @@ int64_t ast_profile(int i, int64_t delta)
        return prof_data->e[i].value;
 }
 
-#if defined ( __i386__) && (defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(linux))
+/* The RDTSC instruction was introduced on the Pentium processor and is not
+ * implemented on certain clones, like the Cyrix 586. Hence, the previous
+ * expectation of __i386__ was in error. */
+#if defined ( __i686__) && (defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined(linux))
 #if defined(__FreeBSD__)
 #include <machine/cpufunc.h>
 #elif defined(linux)