This might be necessary if the bug8117 fix confuses any applications.
Also add a changes file.
--- /dev/null
+ o Major bugfixes:
+
+ - Many SOCKS5 clients, when configured to offer a username/password,
+ offer both username/password authentication and "no authentication".
+ Tor had previously preferred no authentication, but this was
+ problematic when trying to make applications get proper stream
+ isolation with IsolateSOCKSAuth. Now, on any SOCKS port with
+ IsolateSOCKSAuth turned on (which is the default), Tor selects
+ username/password authentication if it's offered. If this confuses your
+ application, you can disable it on a per-SOCKSPort basis via
+ PreferSOCKSNoAuth. Fixes bug 8117; bugfix on 0.2.3.3-alpha.
+
+
the same circuit. Currently, two addresses are "too close" if they lie in
the same /16 range. (Default: 1)
-**SOCKSPort** \['address':]__port__|**auto** [_isolation flags_]::
+**SOCKSPort** \['address':]__port__|**auto** [_flags_] [_isolation flags_]::
Open this port to listen for connections from SOCKS-speaking
applications. Set this to 0 if you don't want to allow application
connections via SOCKS. Set it to "auto" to have Tor pick a port for
port with the same session group. (By default, streams received
on different SOCKSPorts, TransPorts, etc are always isolated from one
another. This option overrides that behavior.)
++
+ Other recognized _flags_ for a SOCKSPort are:
+ **PreferSOCKSNoAuth**;;
+ Ordinarily, when an application offers both "username/password
+ authentication" and "no authentication" to Tor via SOCKS5, Tor
+ selects username/password authentication so that IsolateSOCKSAuth can
+ work. This can confuse some applications, if they offer a
+ username/password combination then get confused when asked for
+ one. You can disable this behavior, so that Tor will select "No
+ authentication" when IsolateSOCKSAuth is disabled, or when this
+ option is set.
+
**SOCKSListenAddress** __IP__[:__PORT__]::
Bind to this address to listen for connections from Socks-speaking
if (req->socks_version != 5) { /* we need to negotiate a method */
unsigned char nummethods = (unsigned char)*(data+1);
+ int have_user_pass, have_no_auth;
int r=0;
tor_assert(!req->socks_version);
if (datalen < 2u+nummethods) {
return -1;
req->replylen = 2; /* 2 bytes of response */
req->reply[0] = 5; /* socks5 reply */
- if (memchr(data+2, SOCKS_USER_PASS, nummethods)) {
+ have_user_pass = (memchr(data+2, SOCKS_USER_PASS, nummethods) !=NULL);
+ have_no_auth = (memchr(data+2, SOCKS_NO_AUTH, nummethods) !=NULL);
+ if (have_user_pass && !(have_no_auth && req->socks_prefer_no_auth)) {
req->auth_type = SOCKS_USER_PASS;
req->reply[1] = SOCKS_USER_PASS; /* tell client to use "user/pass"
auth method */
req->socks_version = 5; /* remember we've already negotiated auth */
log_debug(LD_APP,"socks5: accepted method 2 (username/password)");
r=0;
- } else if (memchr(data+2, SOCKS_NO_AUTH, nummethods)) {
+ } else if (have_no_auth) {
req->reply[1] = SOCKS_NO_AUTH; /* tell client to use "none" auth
method */
req->socks_version = 5; /* remember we've already negotiated auth */
int port;
int sessiongroup = SESSION_GROUP_UNSET;
unsigned isolation = ISO_DEFAULT;
+ int prefer_no_auth = 0;
char *addrport;
uint16_t ptmp=0;
no = 1;
elt += 2;
}
+ if (!strcasecmp(elt, "PreferSOCKSNoAuth")) {
+ prefer_no_auth = ! no;
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (!strcasecmpend(elt, "s"))
elt[strlen(elt)-1] = '\0'; /* kill plurals. */
cfg->all_addrs = all_addrs;
cfg->ipv4_only = ipv4_only;
cfg->ipv6_only = ipv6_only;
+ cfg->socks_prefer_no_auth = prefer_no_auth;
+ if (! (isolation & ISO_SOCKSAUTH))
+ cfg->socks_prefer_no_auth = 1;
smartlist_add(out, cfg);
}
lis_conn->session_group = global_next_session_group--;
}
}
+ lis_conn->socks_prefer_no_auth = port_cfg->socks_prefer_no_auth;
if (connection_add(conn) < 0) { /* no space, forget it */
log_warn(LD_NET,"connection_add for listener failed. Giving up.");
newconn->port = port;
newconn->address = tor_dup_addr(&addr);
+ if (new_type == CONN_TYPE_AP) {
+ TO_ENTRY_CONN(newconn)->socks_request->socks_prefer_no_auth =
+ TO_LISTENER_CONN(conn)->socks_prefer_no_auth;
+ }
+
} else if (conn->socket_family == AF_UNIX) {
/* For now only control ports can be Unix domain sockets
* and listeners at the same time */
/** One or more ISO_ flags to describe how to isolate streams. */
uint8_t isolation_flags;
/**@}*/
+ /** For SOCKS connections only: If this is set, we will choose "no
+ * authentication" instead of "username/password" authentication if both
+ * are offered. Used as input to parse_socks. */
+ unsigned int socks_prefer_no_auth : 1;
} listener_connection_t;
uint8_t isolation_flags; /**< Zero or more isolation flags */
int session_group; /**< A session group, or -1 if this port is not in a
* session group. */
+ /* Socks only: */
+ /** When both no-auth and user/pass are advertised by a SOCKS client, select
+ * no-auth. */
+ unsigned int socks_prefer_no_auth : 1;
/* Server port types (or, dir) only: */
unsigned int no_advertise : 1;
* make sure we send back a socks reply for
* every connection. */
unsigned int got_auth : 1; /**< Have we received any authentication data? */
+ /** If this is set, we will choose "no authentication" instead of
+ * "username/password" authentication if both are offered. Used as input to
+ * parse_socks. */
+ unsigned int socks_prefer_no_auth : 1;
/** Number of bytes in username; 0 if username is NULL */
size_t usernamelen;