For the following scenario:
struct tree_node {
struct bpf_refcount ref;
struct bpf_rb_node node;
struct node_data __kptr * node_data;
u64 key;
};
This means node_data would have the type PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC |
NON_OWN_REF | MEM_RCU.
When traversing an rbtree using bpf_rbtree_left/right, if we need to
use bpf_kptr_xchg to read the __kptr pointer, we still need to follow
the remove-read-add sequence.
This patch allows us to use bpf_kptr_xchg to directly read the __kptr
pointer without any prior operations.
Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
Signed-off-by: Feng Yang <yangfeng@kylinos.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260214124042.62229-5-pilgrimtao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE,
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC,
PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF,
+ PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF | MEM_RCU,
}
};
static const struct bpf_reg_types dynptr_types = {
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_PERCPU | MEM_ALLOC:
case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF:
+ case PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF | MEM_RCU:
if (meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_spin_lock && meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock &&
meta->func_id != BPF_FUNC_kptr_xchg) {
verifier_bug(env, "unimplemented handling of MEM_ALLOC");