OverflowError incorrectly on this platform, presumably as a result of
the libm setting errno = ERANGE for this call.
* should return a zero on underflow, and +- HUGE_VAL on
* overflow, so testing the result for zero suffices to
* distinguish the cases).
+ *
+ * On some platforms (Ubuntu/ia64) it seems that errno can be
+ * set to ERANGE for subnormal results that do *not* underflow
+ * to zero. So to be safe, we'll ignore ERANGE whenever the
+ * function result is less than one in absolute value.
*/
- if (x)
+ if (fabs(x) < 1.0)
+ result = 0;
+ else
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError,
"math range error");
- else
- result = 0;
}
else
/* Unexpected math error */