The vgic-v5 code added some evaluations of the timers in a helper funtion
(kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer()) that is called to determine whether
the vcpu can wake-up.
But looking at the timer there is wrong:
- we want to see timers that are signalling an interrupt to the
vcpu, and not just that have a pending interrupt
- we already have kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable() that evaluates the
state of interrupts
- kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer() really is about WFIT, as the timeout
does not generate an interrupt, and is therefore distinct from
the point above
As a consequence, revert these changes and teach vgic_v5_has_pending_ppi()
about checking for pending HW interrupts instead.
Fixes: 9491c63b6cd7b ("KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Enlighten arch timer for GICv5")
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260319154937.3619520-1-sascha.bischoff%40arm.com
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260401103611.357092-13-maz@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
int kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu);
- struct arch_timer_context *ptimer = vcpu_ptimer(vcpu);
-
- return kvm_timer_should_fire(vtimer) || kvm_timer_should_fire(ptimer) ||
- (vcpu_has_wfit_active(vcpu) && wfit_delay_ns(vcpu) == 0);
+ return vcpu_has_wfit_active(vcpu) && wfit_delay_ns(vcpu) == 0;
}
/*
irq = vgic_get_vcpu_irq(vcpu, intid);
scoped_guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave, &irq->irq_lock)
- has_pending = (irq->enabled && irq_is_pending(irq) &&
- irq->priority < priority_mask);
+ if (irq->enabled && irq->priority < priority_mask)
+ has_pending = irq->hw ? vgic_get_phys_line_level(irq) : irq_is_pending(irq);
vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);