After commit
51b85dfeb19652bf3e0aaec08828ba7cee1e641c, when the
pointer offset is a variable in the loop, the object size of the
pointer may also need to be reexamined.
Which make gcc_assert in the check_for_plus_in_loops failed.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/122012
* tree-object-size.cc (check_for_plus_in_loops): Skip check
for the variable offset
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/122012
* gcc.dg/torture/pr122012.c: New test.
Signed-off-by: Linsen Zhou <i@lin.moe>
(cherry picked from commit
82cefc4898d4ccabe76e28d6626b91ca9e998923)
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+void foo();
+
+void test(size_t step) {
+ char *buf = malloc(64);
+ char *p = buf;
+ size_t i;
+
+ for(i = 0; i < 64; ++i) {
+ p += 4;
+ if (__builtin_object_size (p, 2) != 0)
+ foo();
+ p += step;
+ }
+ free(buf);
+}
&& gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt) == POINTER_PLUS_EXPR)
{
tree basevar = gimple_assign_rhs1 (stmt);
- tree cst = gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt);
-
- gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (cst) == INTEGER_CST);
+ tree offset = gimple_assign_rhs2 (stmt);
/* Skip non-positive offsets. */
- if (integer_zerop (cst) || compare_tree_int (cst, offset_limit) > 0)
+ if (TREE_CODE (offset) != INTEGER_CST
+ || integer_zerop (offset) || compare_tree_int (offset, offset_limit) > 0)
return;
osi->depths[SSA_NAME_VERSION (basevar)] = 1;