From: Georg Brandl <georg@python.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:34:20 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Backport r58542.
X-Git-Tag: v2.5.2c1~156
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=051aa7730572cca75ff25b566bf8113b828ed1d7;p=thirdparty%2FPython%2Fcpython.git

Backport r58542.
---

diff --git a/Doc/lib/libfuncs.tex b/Doc/lib/libfuncs.tex
index 345074d8b5e0..4cfd6dca10b6 100644
--- a/Doc/lib/libfuncs.tex
+++ b/Doc/lib/libfuncs.tex
@@ -1280,13 +1280,11 @@ bypass these functions without concerns about missing something important.
   to be added to the end of the argument list.
   Calling \function{apply()} is different from just calling
   \code{\var{function}(\var{args})}, since in that case there is always
-  exactly one argument.  The use of \function{apply()} is equivalent
-  to \code{\var{function}(*\var{args}, **\var{keywords})}.
-  Use of \function{apply()} is not necessary since the ``extended call
-  syntax,'' as used in the last example, is completely equivalent.
+  exactly one argument.  The use of \function{apply()} is exactly
+  equivalent to \code{\var{function}(*\var{args}, **\var{keywords})}.
 
-  \deprecated{2.3}{Use the extended call syntax instead, as described
-                   above.}
+  \deprecated{2.3}{Use the extended call syntax with \code{*args}
+  and \code{**keywords} instead.}
 \end{funcdesc}
 
 \begin{funcdesc}{buffer}{object\optional{, offset\optional{, size}}}