From: Jack Jansen Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 14:59:26 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Documented the fact that the main class now mimicks the OSA "application" class. X-Git-Tag: v2.3c1~469 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=097da0dc012d8c8164a043eee8f4b9622bc7b843;p=thirdparty%2FPython%2Fcpython.git Documented the fact that the main class now mimicks the OSA "application" class. --- diff --git a/Doc/mac/scripting.tex b/Doc/mac/scripting.tex index f126e3c1dada..43da493d9ede 100644 --- a/Doc/mac/scripting.tex +++ b/Doc/mac/scripting.tex @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ In Python, the following code fragment will do the same: import Finder f = Finder.Finder() -print f.get(Finder.window(1).name) +print f.get(f.window(1).name) \end{verbatim} As distributed the Python library includes packages that implement the @@ -64,10 +64,12 @@ direct object as the first argument and all optional parameters as keyword arguments. AppleScript classes are also implemented as Python classes, as are comparisons and all the other thingies. -Note that in the current release there is no coupling between the main -Python class implementing the verbs and the Python classes implementing -the AppleScript classes. Hence, in the example above we need to use -\code{f.get(Finder.window(1).name)} in stead of the more Pythonic +The main +Python class implementing the verbs also allows access to the properties +and elements declared in the AppleScript class "application". In the +current release that is as far as the object orientation goes, so +in the example above we need to use +\code{f.get(f.window(1).name)} in stead of the more Pythonic \code{f.window(1).name.get()}.