From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 00:15:42 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: * README.Portability: Fix typos.
X-Git-Tag: releases/gcc-3.3.0~4003
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0b558962c137955bccb445d01c61c8d370212526;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

* README.Portability: Fix typos.

From-SVN: r55164
---

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index ed5e361adead..7cd464157c31 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2002-07-02  Alan Modra  <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
+
+	* README.Portability: Fix typos.
+
 2002-07-01  Hans-Peter Nilsson  <hp@axis.com>
 
 	PR target/7177
diff --git a/gcc/README.Portability b/gcc/README.Portability
index dba12406c61b..04638b2a00cd 100644
--- a/gcc/README.Portability
+++ b/gcc/README.Portability
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ int myfunc PARAMS ((double, int *));
 
 int
 myfunc (var1, var2)
-	double var1;
-	int *var2;
+     double var1;
+     int *var2;
 {
   ...
 }
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ myfunc (var1, var2)
 This implies that if the function takes no arguments, it should be
 declared and defined as follows:
 
-int myfunc PARAMS ((void))
+int myfunc PARAMS ((void));
 
 int
 myfunc ()
@@ -300,8 +300,8 @@ long and int are not the same size.
 Second, if you write a function definition with no return type at
 all:
 
-  operate(a, b)
-      int a, b;
+  operate (a, b)
+       int a, b;
   {
     ...
   }
@@ -314,8 +314,8 @@ Implicit function declarations always have return type int.  So if you
 correct the above definition to
 
   void
-  operate(a, b)
-      int a, b;
+  operate (a, b)
+       int a, b;
   ...
 
 but operate() is called above its definition, you will get an error