From: soolabettu <17737361+soolabettu@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 15:50:53 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: gh-137090: Remove redundant statement in ``Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst... 
X-Git-Tag: v3.15.0a1~848
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1e69cd1634e4f0f8c375be85d11925bd12deef23;p=thirdparty%2FPython%2Fcpython.git

gh-137090: Remove redundant statement in ``Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst`` (#137091)

Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
---

diff --git a/Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst b/Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst
index be9d565f8e0d..41ea6af3b226 100644
--- a/Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/concurrent.interpreters.rst
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ makes them similar to processes, but they still enjoy in-process
 efficiency, like threads.
 
 All that said, interpreters do naturally support certain flavors of
-concurrency, as a powerful side effect of that isolation.
+concurrency.
 There's a powerful side effect of that isolation.  It enables a
 different approach to concurrency than you can take with async or
 threads.  It's a similar concurrency model to CSP or the actor model,