From: Mike Yuan Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:41:29 +0000 (+0800) Subject: systemctl: reflect that statically enabled units can be in .upholds/ X-Git-Tag: v255-rc1~405^2~5 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1f998158a988fcf4cd182d9de27e1d8b16cfe474;p=thirdparty%2Fsystemd.git systemctl: reflect that statically enabled units can be in .upholds/ Follow-up for 38f901791f3c4b1cbd04b71323bbef2fdab65f83 --- diff --git a/src/systemctl/systemctl-enable.c b/src/systemctl/systemctl-enable.c index 940f54607ff..4f12f929d28 100644 --- a/src/systemctl/systemctl-enable.c +++ b/src/systemctl/systemctl-enable.c @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ int verb_enable(int argc, char *argv[], void *userdata) { " \n" /* trick: the space is needed so that the line does not get stripped from output */ "Possible reasons for having this kind of units are:\n" "%1$s A unit may be statically enabled by being symlinked from another unit's\n" - " .wants/ or .requires/ directory.\n" + " .wants/, .requires/, or .upholds/ directory.\n" "%1$s A unit's purpose may be to act as a helper for some other unit which has\n" " a requirement dependency on it.\n" "%1$s A unit may be started when needed via activation (socket, path, timer,\n"