From: Christian Brauner Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 23:12:40 +0000 (+0100) Subject: cleanup: fix scoped_class() X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4e97bae1b412cd6ed8053b3d8a242122952985cc;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git cleanup: fix scoped_class() This is a class, not a guard so why on earth is it checking for guard pointers or conditional lock acquisition? None of it makes any sense at all. I'm not sure what happened back then. Maybe I had a brief psychedelic period that I completely forgot about and spaced out into a zone where that initial macro implementation made any sense at all. Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251103-work-creds-init_cred-v1-1-cb3ec8711a6a@kernel.org Fixes: 5c21c5f22d07 ("cleanup: add a scoped version of CLASS()") Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner --- diff --git a/include/linux/cleanup.h b/include/linux/cleanup.h index 2573585b7f06..19c7e475d3a4 100644 --- a/include/linux/cleanup.h +++ b/include/linux/cleanup.h @@ -290,15 +290,16 @@ static inline class_##_name##_t class_##_name##ext##_constructor(_init_args) \ class_##_name##_t var __cleanup(class_##_name##_destructor) = \ class_##_name##_constructor -#define scoped_class(_name, var, args) \ - for (CLASS(_name, var)(args); \ - __guard_ptr(_name)(&var) || !__is_cond_ptr(_name); \ - ({ goto _label; })) \ - if (0) { \ -_label: \ - break; \ +#define __scoped_class(_name, var, _label, args...) \ + for (CLASS(_name, var)(args); ; ({ goto _label; })) \ + if (0) { \ +_label: \ + break; \ } else +#define scoped_class(_name, var, args...) \ + __scoped_class(_name, var, __UNIQUE_ID(label), args) + /* * DEFINE_GUARD(name, type, lock, unlock): * trivial wrapper around DEFINE_CLASS() above specifically