From: Segher Boessenkool Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:49:09 +0000 (+0000) Subject: rs6000: Fix GC on rs6000.c decls for atomic handling (PR88134) X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-13~967 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=537c96588026aec09b9a00d6d0f3670f612428b5;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git rs6000: Fix GC on rs6000.c decls for atomic handling (PR88134) In PR88134 it is pointed out that we do not have GTY markup for some variables we use for atomic. So, let's add that. 2022-02-22 Segher Boessenkool PR target/88134 * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (atomic_hold_decl, atomic_clear_decl, atomic_update_decl): Add GTY markup. --- diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc index ca9e7b80dcbf..a855e8c4c72a 100644 --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc @@ -27699,14 +27699,13 @@ emit_fusion_gpr_load (rtx target, rtx mem) return ""; } - -#ifdef RS6000_GLIBC_ATOMIC_FENV -/* Function declarations for rs6000_atomic_assign_expand_fenv. */ -static tree atomic_hold_decl, atomic_clear_decl, atomic_update_decl; -#endif +/* This is not inside an #ifdef RS6000_GLIBC_ATOMIC_FENV because gengtype + ignores it then. */ +static GTY(()) tree atomic_hold_decl; +static GTY(()) tree atomic_clear_decl; +static GTY(()) tree atomic_update_decl; /* Implement TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV hook. */ - static void rs6000_atomic_assign_expand_fenv (tree *hold, tree *clear, tree *update) {