From: Sunil Khatri Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 06:43:09 +0000 (+0530) Subject: drm/amdgpu: add upper bound check on user inputs in wait ioctl X-Git-Tag: v7.0-rc2~27^2^2~6 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=64ac7c09fc44985ec9bb6a9db740899fa40ca613;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git drm/amdgpu: add upper bound check on user inputs in wait ioctl Huge input values in amdgpu_userq_wait_ioctl can lead to a OOM and could be exploited. So check these input value against AMDGPU_USERQ_MAX_HANDLES which is big enough value for genuine use cases and could potentially avoid OOM. v2: squash in Srini's fix Signed-off-by: Sunil Khatri Reviewed-by: Christian König Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher (cherry picked from commit fcec012c664247531aed3e662f4280ff804d1476) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c index c5f5af20af756..7e9cf1868cc9f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c @@ -671,6 +671,11 @@ int amdgpu_userq_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, if (!amdgpu_userq_enabled(dev)) return -ENOTSUPP; + if (wait_info->num_syncobj_handles > AMDGPU_USERQ_MAX_HANDLES || + wait_info->num_bo_write_handles > AMDGPU_USERQ_MAX_HANDLES || + wait_info->num_bo_read_handles > AMDGPU_USERQ_MAX_HANDLES) + return -EINVAL; + num_read_bo_handles = wait_info->num_bo_read_handles; bo_handles_read = memdup_user(u64_to_user_ptr(wait_info->bo_read_handles), size_mul(sizeof(u32), num_read_bo_handles));