From: Shivaji Kant Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 06:54:19 +0000 (+0000) Subject: net: devmem: refresh devmem TX dst in case of route invalidation X-Git-Tag: v6.18-rc4~24^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6a2108c78069fda000729b88c97b1eba0405e6d7;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git net: devmem: refresh devmem TX dst in case of route invalidation The zero-copy Device Memory (Devmem) transmit path relies on the socket's route cache (`dst_entry`) to validate that the packet is being sent via the network device to which the DMA buffer was bound. However, this check incorrectly fails and returns `-ENODEV` if the socket's route cache entry (`dst`) is merely missing or expired (`dst == NULL`). This scenario is observed during network events, such as when flow steering rules are deleted, leading to a temporary route cache invalidation. This patch fixes -ENODEV error for `net_devmem_get_binding()` by doing the following: 1. It attempts to rebuild the route via `rebuild_header()` if the route is initially missing (`dst == NULL`). This allows the TCP/IP stack to recover from transient route cache misses. 2. It uses `rcu_read_lock()` and `dst_dev_rcu()` to safely access the network device pointer (`dst_dev`) from the route, preventing use-after-free conditions if the device is concurrently removed. 3. It maintains the critical safety check by validating that the retrieved destination device (`dst_dev`) is exactly the device registered in the Devmem binding (`binding->dev`). These changes prevent unnecessary ENODEV failures while maintaining the critical safety requirement that the Devmem resources are only used on the bound network device. Reviewed-by: Bobby Eshleman Reported-by: Eric Dumazet Reported-by: Vedant Mathur Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet Fixes: bd61848900bf ("net: devmem: Implement TX path") Signed-off-by: Shivaji Kant Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251029065420.3489943-1-shivajikant@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c index d9de31a6cc7f..1d04754bc756 100644 --- a/net/core/devmem.c +++ b/net/core/devmem.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include "devmem.h" @@ -357,7 +358,8 @@ struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *net_devmem_get_binding(struct sock *sk, unsigned int dmabuf_id) { struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding; - struct dst_entry *dst = __sk_dst_get(sk); + struct net_device *dst_dev; + struct dst_entry *dst; int err = 0; binding = net_devmem_lookup_dmabuf(dmabuf_id); @@ -366,16 +368,35 @@ struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *net_devmem_get_binding(struct sock *sk, goto out_err; } + rcu_read_lock(); + dst = __sk_dst_get(sk); + /* If dst is NULL (route expired), attempt to rebuild it. */ + if (unlikely(!dst)) { + if (inet_csk(sk)->icsk_af_ops->rebuild_header(sk)) { + err = -EHOSTUNREACH; + goto out_unlock; + } + dst = __sk_dst_get(sk); + if (unlikely(!dst)) { + err = -ENODEV; + goto out_unlock; + } + } + /* The dma-addrs in this binding are only reachable to the corresponding * net_device. */ - if (!dst || !dst->dev || dst->dev->ifindex != binding->dev->ifindex) { + dst_dev = dst_dev_rcu(dst); + if (unlikely(!dst_dev) || unlikely(dst_dev != binding->dev)) { err = -ENODEV; - goto out_err; + goto out_unlock; } + rcu_read_unlock(); return binding; +out_unlock: + rcu_read_unlock(); out_err: if (binding) net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_put(binding);