From: Jason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 07:48:44 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: remove obsolete destructors and goto node
X-Git-Tag: prereleases/libstdc++-2.92~11187
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=80dabe332af45fd572921d401c07e3879bd0d90e;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

remove obsolete destructors and goto node

From-SVN: r28701
---

diff --git a/gcc/extend.texi b/gcc/extend.texi
index 253b0e635673..a8ebfc8e1529 100644
--- a/gcc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/extend.texi
@@ -3150,8 +3150,6 @@ Predefined Macros,cpp.info,The C Preprocessor}).
 @menu
 * Naming Results::      Giving a name to C++ function return values.
 * Min and Max::		C++ Minimum and maximum operators.
-* Destructors and Goto:: Goto is safe to use in C++ even when destructors
-                           are needed.
 * C++ Interface::       You can use a single C++ header file for both
                          declarations and definitions.
 * Template Instantiation:: Methods for ensuring that exactly one copy of
@@ -3318,19 +3316,6 @@ Since @code{<?} and @code{>?} are built into the compiler, they properly
 handle expressions with side-effects;  @w{@samp{int min = i++ <? j++;}}
 works correctly.
 
-@node Destructors and Goto
-@section @code{goto} and Destructors in GNU C++
-
-@cindex @code{goto} in C++
-@cindex destructors vs @code{goto}
-In C++ programs, you can safely use the @code{goto} statement.  When you
-use it to exit a block which contains aggregates requiring destructors,
-the destructors will run before the @code{goto} transfers control.
-
-@cindex constructors vs @code{goto}
-The compiler still forbids using @code{goto} to @emph{enter} a scope
-that requires constructors.
-
 @node C++ Interface
 @section Declarations and Definitions in One Header