From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:55:31 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Corrected number in GNUTLS_PSK_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256. X-Git-Tag: gnutls_3_2_6~36 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a4af5e8a3da7d701ee7bb995b7b4137494dcf900;p=thirdparty%2Fgnutls.git Corrected number in GNUTLS_PSK_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256. RFC6367 seems to have assigned both {0xC0,0x8D} and {0xC0,0x8E} to this ciphersuite. However {0xC0,0x8D} should be a typo as it is used by another ciphersuite in the same document. --- diff --git a/lib/algorithms/ciphersuites.c b/lib/algorithms/ciphersuites.c index c730640c4e..03b2118fcc 100644 --- a/lib/algorithms/ciphersuites.c +++ b/lib/algorithms/ciphersuites.c @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ typedef struct #define GNUTLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 { 0xC0,0x87 } #define GNUTLS_ECDHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 { 0xC0,0x8A } #define GNUTLS_ECDHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 { 0xC0,0x8B } -#define GNUTLS_PSK_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 { 0xC0,0x8D } +#define GNUTLS_PSK_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 { 0xC0,0x8E } #define GNUTLS_PSK_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 { 0xC0,0x8F } #define GNUTLS_DHE_PSK_CAMELLIA_128_GCM_SHA256 { 0xC0,0x90 } #define GNUTLS_DHE_PSK_CAMELLIA_256_GCM_SHA384 { 0xC0,0x91 }