From: Andrew Pinski Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 03:04:38 +0000 (-0700) Subject: testsuite: Fix fold-vecperm-1.c for targets that don't have vectors X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ab29201c5bb8158eb22133ba41b147bb2d115026;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git testsuite: Fix fold-vecperm-1.c for targets that don't have vectors This testcase is testing at optimization but with targets that don't have vectors it will fail because there will be zero VEC_PERM_EXPR. So instead let's check earlier in say forwprop3. Pushed as obvious after a test on x86_64-linux-gnu with -mno-sse. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c: Test at forwprop3. Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski --- diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c index 5d4456b98b1..878d3920803 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-vecperm-1.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-forwprop3" } */ typedef int v4si __attribute__((vector_size(16))); typedef short v8hi __attribute__((vector_size(16))); @@ -20,4 +20,4 @@ int128 concat (int128 a, int128 b) { return res; } -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "VEC_PERM_EXPR" 1 "optimized" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "VEC_PERM_EXPR" 1 "forwprop3" } } */