From: Miss Islington (bot) <31488909+miss-islington@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 10:03:12 +0000 (-0700) Subject: [3.12] gh-110138: Improve grammar in idiomatic usage of ``__main__.py`` (GH-110142... X-Git-Tag: v3.12.0~6 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b0a8cb2901be6b5148b3ed1213035c625349e9f0;p=thirdparty%2FPython%2Fcpython.git [3.12] gh-110138: Improve grammar in idiomatic usage of ``__main__.py`` (GH-110142) (#110188) gh-110138: Improve grammar in idiomatic usage of ``__main__.py`` (GH-110142) (cherry picked from commit adf0f15a06c6e8ddd1a6d59b28efcbb26289f080) Co-authored-by: Quentin Agren --- diff --git a/Doc/library/__main__.rst b/Doc/library/__main__.rst index fd60d92d4eb0..d378e40b3906 100644 --- a/Doc/library/__main__.rst +++ b/Doc/library/__main__.rst @@ -238,9 +238,9 @@ package. For more details, see :ref:`intra-package-references` in the Idiomatic Usage ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -The contents of ``__main__.py`` typically isn't fenced with -``if __name__ == '__main__'`` blocks. Instead, those files are kept short, -functions to execute from other modules. Those other modules can then be +The content of ``__main__.py`` typically isn't fenced with an +``if __name__ == '__main__'`` block. Instead, those files are kept +short and import functions to execute from other modules. Those other modules can then be easily unit-tested and are properly reusable. If used, an ``if __name__ == '__main__'`` block will still work as expected