From: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2026 19:55:42 +0000 (+0000) Subject: locking/semaphore: Remove the list_head from struct semaphore X-Git-Tag: v7.1-rc1~199^2~16 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b9bdd4b6840454ef87f61b6506c9635c57a81650;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Flinux.git locking/semaphore: Remove the list_head from struct semaphore Instead of embedding a list_head in struct semaphore, store a pointer to the first waiter. The list of waiters remains a doubly linked list so we can efficiently add to the tail of the list and remove from the front (or middle) of the list. Some of the list manipulation becomes more complicated, but it's a reasonable tradeoff on the slow paths to shrink data structures which embed a semaphore. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260305195545.3707590-3-willy@infradead.org --- diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c index 5b777316b9acd..2af0db9210fe4 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c @@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_delete_semaphore(acpi_handle handle) ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_MUTEX, "Deleting semaphore[%p].\n", handle)); - BUG_ON(!list_empty(&sem->wait_list)); + BUG_ON(sem->first_waiter); kfree(sem); sem = NULL; diff --git a/include/linux/semaphore.h b/include/linux/semaphore.h index 89706157e6223..a4c8651ef0217 100644 --- a/include/linux/semaphore.h +++ b/include/linux/semaphore.h @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct semaphore { raw_spinlock_t lock; unsigned int count; - struct list_head wait_list; + struct semaphore_waiter *first_waiter; #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK_BLOCKER unsigned long last_holder; @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ struct semaphore { { \ .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED((name).lock), \ .count = n, \ - .wait_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT((name).wait_list) \ + .first_waiter = NULL \ __LAST_HOLDER_SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER \ } diff --git a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c index 3ef032e22f7ef..74d41433ba13c 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/semaphore.c +++ b/kernel/locking/semaphore.c @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ * too. * * The ->count variable represents how many more tasks can acquire this - * semaphore. If it's zero, there may be tasks waiting on the wait_list. + * semaphore. If it's zero, there may be waiters. */ #include @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ void __sched up(struct semaphore *sem) hung_task_sem_clear_if_holder(sem); - if (likely(list_empty(&sem->wait_list))) + if (likely(!sem->first_waiter)) sem->count++; else __up(sem, &wake_q); @@ -244,6 +244,21 @@ struct semaphore_waiter { bool up; }; +static inline +void sem_del_waiter(struct semaphore *sem, struct semaphore_waiter *waiter) +{ + if (list_empty(&waiter->list)) { + sem->first_waiter = NULL; + return; + } + + if (sem->first_waiter == waiter) { + sem->first_waiter = list_first_entry(&waiter->list, + struct semaphore_waiter, list); + } + list_del(&waiter->list); +} + /* * Because this function is inlined, the 'state' parameter will be * constant, and thus optimised away by the compiler. Likewise the @@ -252,9 +267,15 @@ struct semaphore_waiter { static inline int __sched ___down_common(struct semaphore *sem, long state, long timeout) { - struct semaphore_waiter waiter; - - list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list); + struct semaphore_waiter waiter, *first; + + first = sem->first_waiter; + if (first) { + list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &first->list); + } else { + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&waiter.list); + sem->first_waiter = &waiter; + } waiter.task = current; waiter.up = false; @@ -274,11 +295,11 @@ static inline int __sched ___down_common(struct semaphore *sem, long state, } timed_out: - list_del(&waiter.list); + sem_del_waiter(sem, &waiter); return -ETIME; interrupted: - list_del(&waiter.list); + sem_del_waiter(sem, &waiter); return -EINTR; } @@ -321,9 +342,9 @@ static noinline int __sched __down_timeout(struct semaphore *sem, long timeout) static noinline void __sched __up(struct semaphore *sem, struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { - struct semaphore_waiter *waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list, - struct semaphore_waiter, list); - list_del(&waiter->list); + struct semaphore_waiter *waiter = sem->first_waiter; + + sem_del_waiter(sem, waiter); waiter->up = true; wake_q_add(wake_q, waiter->task); }