From: Nathan Bossart Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 21:32:01 +0000 (-0600) Subject: Convert SpinLock* macros to static inline functions. X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bfc321b4723e8ca5fd3adb22a2727ec5c55d3808;p=thirdparty%2Fpostgresql.git Convert SpinLock* macros to static inline functions. This is preparatory work for a proposed follow-up commit that would add assertions to these functions. Reviewed-by: Fabrízio de Royes Mello Reviewed-by: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aZX2oUcKf7IzHnnK%40nathan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200617183354.pm3biu3zbmo2pktq%40alap3.anarazel.de --- diff --git a/src/include/storage/spin.h b/src/include/storage/spin.h index 78c95ae538b..9cf6adb671a 100644 --- a/src/include/storage/spin.h +++ b/src/include/storage/spin.h @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ * * * The interface to spinlocks is defined by the typedef "slock_t" and - * these macros: + * these functions: * * void SpinLockInit(volatile slock_t *lock) * Initialize a spinlock (to the unlocked state). @@ -18,9 +18,6 @@ * void SpinLockRelease(volatile slock_t *lock) * Unlock a previously acquired lock. * - * Callers must beware that the macro argument may be evaluated multiple - * times! - * * Load and store operations in calling code are guaranteed not to be * reordered with respect to these operations, because they include a * compiler barrier. (Before PostgreSQL 9.5, callers needed to use a @@ -29,9 +26,9 @@ * Keep in mind the coding rule that spinlocks must not be held for more * than a few instructions. In particular, we assume it is not possible * for a CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to occur while holding a spinlock, and so - * it is not necessary to do HOLD/RESUME_INTERRUPTS() in these macros. + * it is not necessary to do HOLD/RESUME_INTERRUPTS() in these functions. * - * These macros are implemented in terms of hardware-dependent macros + * These functions are implemented in terms of hardware-dependent macros * supplied by s_lock.h. There is not currently any extra functionality * added by this header, but there has been in the past and may someday * be again. @@ -49,11 +46,22 @@ #include "storage/s_lock.h" +static inline void +SpinLockInit(volatile slock_t *lock) +{ + S_INIT_LOCK(lock); +} -#define SpinLockInit(lock) S_INIT_LOCK(lock) - -#define SpinLockAcquire(lock) S_LOCK(lock) +static inline void +SpinLockAcquire(volatile slock_t *lock) +{ + S_LOCK(lock); +} -#define SpinLockRelease(lock) S_UNLOCK(lock) +static inline void +SpinLockRelease(volatile slock_t *lock) +{ + S_UNLOCK(lock); +} #endif /* SPIN_H */