From: Pablo Galindo Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 08:48:41 +0000 (+0100) Subject: bpo-41531: Fix compilation of dict literals with more than 0xFFFF elements (GH-21850) X-Git-Tag: v3.10.0a1~263 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c51db0ea40ddabaf5f771ea633b37fcf4c90a495;p=thirdparty%2FPython%2Fcpython.git bpo-41531: Fix compilation of dict literals with more than 0xFFFF elements (GH-21850) --- diff --git a/Lib/test/test_compile.py b/Lib/test/test_compile.py index 3dd8c8d1db81..6055192bf705 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_compile.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_compile.py @@ -752,6 +752,16 @@ if 1: self.assertEqual(None, opcodes[0].argval) self.assertEqual('RETURN_VALUE', opcodes[1].opname) + def test_big_dict_literal(self): + # The compiler has a flushing point in "compiler_dict" that calls compiles + # a portion of the dictionary literal when the loop that iterates over the items + # reaches 0xFFFF elements but the code was not including the boundary element, + # dropping the key at position 0xFFFF. See bpo-41531 for more information + + dict_size = 0xFFFF + 1 + the_dict = "{" + ",".join(f"{x}:{x}" for x in range(dict_size)) + "}" + self.assertEqual(len(eval(the_dict)), dict_size) + class TestExpressionStackSize(unittest.TestCase): # These tests check that the computed stack size for a code object # stays within reasonable bounds (see issue #21523 for an example diff --git a/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2020-08-12-19-32-15.bpo-41531.WgPzjT.rst b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2020-08-12-19-32-15.bpo-41531.WgPzjT.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..8544664f3933 --- /dev/null +++ b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core and Builtins/2020-08-12-19-32-15.bpo-41531.WgPzjT.rst @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +Fix a bug that was dropping keys when compiling dict literals with more than +0xFFFF elements. Patch by Pablo Galindo. diff --git a/Python/compile.c b/Python/compile.c index 5dbd9f221fdf..2c5326686f86 100644 --- a/Python/compile.c +++ b/Python/compile.c @@ -3894,7 +3894,7 @@ compiler_dict(struct compiler *c, expr_ty e) } else { if (elements == 0xFFFF) { - if (!compiler_subdict(c, e, i - elements, i)) { + if (!compiler_subdict(c, e, i - elements, i + 1)) { return 0; } if (have_dict) {