From: Graham Leggett As of Apache HTTP server version 2.2 As The Apache HTTP server offers a range of caching features that
+ are designed to improve the performance of the server in various
+ ways. To get the most from this document, you should be familiar with
the basics of HTTP, and have read the Users' Guides to
@@ -75,102 +86,182 @@
There are two main stages in This means that any other stages that might ordinarily happen
- in the process of serving a request -- for example being handled
- by If the URL is not found within the cache, If the URL is found within the cache, but also found to have expired,
- the filter is added anyway, but The HTTP protocol contains built in support for an in-line caching
+ mechanism
+
+ described by section 13 of RFC2616, and the
+ Unlike a simple two state key/value cache where the content
+ disappears completely when no longer fresh, an HTTP cache includes
+ a mechanism to retain stale content, and to ask the origin server
+ whether this stale content has changed and if not, make it fresh
+ again. An entry in an HTTP cache exists in one of three states: If the content is too old (older than its freshness
+ lifetime), it is considered stale. An
+ HTTP cache should contact the origin server and check whether
+ the content is still fresh before serving stale content to a
+ client. The origin server will either respond with replacement
+ content if not still valid, or ideally, the origin server will
+ respond with a code to tell the cache the content is still
+ fresh, without the need to generate or send the content again.
+ The content becomes fresh again and the cycle continues. The HTTP protocol does allow the cache to serve stale data
+ under certain circumstances, such as when an attempt to freshen
+ the data with an origin server has failed with a 5xx error, or
+ when another request is already in the process of freshening
+ the given entry. In these cases a Full details of how HTTP caching works can be found in
+
+ Section 13 of RFC2616. The This phase happens very early on during the request processing,
+ just after the request has been parsed. If the content is
+ found within the cache, it is served immediately and almost
+ all request processing is bypassed. In this scenario, the cache behaves as if it has been "bolted
+ on" to the front of the server. This mode offers the best performance, as the majority of
+ server processing is bypassed. This mode however also bypasses the
+ authentication and authorization phases of server processing, so
+ this mode should be chosen with care when this is important. This phase happens late in the request processing, after all
+ the request phases have completed. In this scenario, the cache behaves as if it has been "bolted
+ on" to the back of the server. This mode offers the most flexibility, as the potential exists
+ for caching to occur at a precisely controlled point in the filter
+ chain, and cached content can be filtered or personalized before
+ being sent to the client. If the URL is not found within the cache, If the content found within the cache is stale, the
+ When caching locally generated content, ensuring that
- When a virtual host is known by one of many different server aliases,
+ ensuring that Because caching is performed within the URL to filename translation
- phase, cached documents will only be served in response to URL requests.
- Ordinarily this is of little consequence, but there is one circumstance
- in which it matters: If you are using Server
- Side Includes; If you are using Server Side Includes, and want the benefit of speedy
- serves from the cache, you should use The default expiry period for cached entities is one hour, however
+ Well formed content that is intended to be cached should declare an
+ explicit freshness lifetime with the At the same time, the origin server defined freshness lifetime can
+ be overridden by a client when the client presents their own
+ When this freshness lifetime is missing from the request or the
+ response, a default freshness lifetime is applied. The default
+ freshness lifetime for cached entities is one hour, however
this can be easily over-ridden by using the
+
+
+
+ Warning header
+ is added to the response.
+
+
+ On can dramatically improve the ratio of cache hits. This
- is because the hostname of the virtual-host serving the content forms
- a part of the cache key. With the setting set to On
+ On can dramatically improve the ratio of cache hits.
+ This is because the hostname of the virtual-host serving the content is
+ used within the cache key. With the setting set to On
virtual-hosts with multiple server names or aliases will not produce
differently cached entities, and instead content will be cached as
per the canonical hostname.
-<!--#include virtual="/footer.html" -->
-
-<!-- The following include can not be cached -->
-<!--#include file="/path/to/footer.html" -->
- virtual include
- types.Cache-Control
+ header's max-age or s-maxage fields, or
+ by including an Expires header.Cache-Control header within the request. In this case,
+ the lowest freshness lifetime between request and response wins.
If a response does not include an Expires header but does
include a Last-Modified header,
For local content,
For local content, or for remote content that does not define its own
+ Expires header, max-age and
+ Expires.
The maximum expiry period may also be controlled by using the +
The maximum freshness lifetime may also be controlled by using the
When content expires from the cache and is re-requested from the - backend or content provider, rather than pass on the original request, - httpd will use a conditional request instead.
- -HTTP offers a number of headers which allow a client, or cache - to discern between different versions of the same content. For - example if a resource was served with an "Etag:" header, it is - possible to make a conditional request with an "If-None-Match:" - header. If a resource was served with a "Last-Modified:" header - it is possible to make a conditional request with an - "If-Modified-Since:" header, and so on.
- -When such a conditional request is made, the response differs - depending on whether the content matches the conditions. If a request is - made with an "If-Modified-Since:" header, and the content has not been - modified since the time indicated in the request then a terse "304 Not - Modified" response is issued.
- -If the content has changed, then it is served as if the request were - not conditional to begin with.
- -The benefits of conditional requests in relation to caching are - twofold. Firstly, when making such a request to the backend, if the - content from the backend matches the content in the store, this can be - determined easily and without the overhead of transferring the entire - resource.
- -Secondly, conditional requests are usually less strenuous on the
- backend. For static files, typically all that is involved is a call
- to stat() or similar system call, to see if the file has
- changed in size or modification time. As such, even if httpd is
- caching local content, even expired content may still be served faster
- from the cache if it has not changed. As long as reading from the cache
- store is faster than reading from the backend (e.g.
When content expires from the cache and becomes stale, rather than + pass on the original request, httpd will modify the request to make + it conditional instead.
+ +When an ETag header exists in the original cached
+ response, If-None-Match header to the request to the origin server.
+ When a Last-Modified header exists in the original
+ cached response, If-Modified-Since header to the request to the origin
+ server. Performing either of these actions makes the request
+ conditional.
When a conditional request is received by an origin server, the + origin server should check whether the ETag or the Last-Modified + parameter has changed, as appropriate for the request. If not, the + origin should respond with a terse "304 Not Modified" response. This + signals to the cache that the stale content is still fresh should be + used for subsequent requests until the content's new freshness lifetime + is reached again.
+ +If the content has changed, then the content is served as if the + request were not conditional to begin with.
+ +Conditional requests offer two benefits. Firstly, when making such + a request to the origin server, if the content from the origin + matches the content in the cache, this can be determined easily and + without the overhead of transferring the entire resource.
+ +Secondly, a well designed origin server will be designed in such
+ a way that conditional requests will be significantly cheaper to
+ produce than a full response. For static files, typically all that is
+ involved is a call to stat() or similar system call, to
+ see if the file has changed in size or modification time. As such, even
+ local content may still be served faster from the cache if it has not
+ changed.
Origin servers should make every effort to support conditional + requests as is practical, however if conditional requests are not + supported, the origin will respond as if the request was not + conditional, and the cache will respond as if the content had changed + and save the new content to the cache. In this case, the cache will + behave like a simple two state cache, where content is effectively + either fresh or deleted.
As mentioned already, the two styles of caching in httpd work
- differently,
The full definition of which responses can be cached by an HTTP + cache is defined in + + RFC2616 Section 13.4 Response Cacheability, and can be summed up as + follows:
In short, any content which is highly time-sensitive, or which varies - depending on the particulars of the request that are not covered by - HTTP negotiation, should not be cached.
+It should be up to the client creating the request, or the origin
+ server constructing the response to decide whether or not the content
+ should be cacheable or not by correctly setting the
+ Cache-Control header, and
If you have dynamic content which changes depending on the IP address - of the requester, or changes every 5 minutes, it should almost certainly - not be cached.
+Content that is time sensitive, or which varies depending on the
+ particulars of the request that are not covered by HTTP negotiation,
+ should not be cached. This content should declare itself uncacheable
+ using the Cache-Control header.
If content changes often, expressed by a freshness lifetime of minutes + or seconds, the content can still be cached, however it is highly + desirable that the origin server supports + conditional requests correctly to ensure that + full responses do not have to be generated on a regular basis.
+ +Content that varies based on client provided request headers can be
+ cached through intelligent use of the Vary response
+ header.
If on the other hand, the content served differs depending on the - values of various HTTP headers, it might be possible - to cache it intelligently through the use of a "Vary" header.
If a response with a "Vary" header is received by
-
When the origin server is designed to respond with different content + based on the value of headers in the request, for example to serve + multiple languages at the same URL, HTTP's caching mechanism makes it + possible to cache multiple variants of the same page at the same URL.
+ +This is done by the origin server adding a Vary header
+ to indicate which headers must be taken into account by a cache when
+ determining whether two variants are different from one another.
If for example, a response is received with a vary header such as;
@@ -311,270 +414,36 @@ Vary: negotiate,accept-language,accept-charsetMultiple variants of the content can be cached side by side,
+ Vary header and the
+ corresponding values of the request headers listed by Vary
+ to decide on which of many variants to return to the client.
Using
As traversing a filesystem hierarchy to examine potential
- .htaccess files would be a very expensive operation,
- partially defeating the point of caching (to speed up requests),
-
If, for example, your configuration permits access to a resource by IP
- address you should ensure that this content is not cached. You can do this
- by using the
As requests to end-users can be served from the cache, the cache - itself can become a target for those wishing to deface or interfere with - content. It is important to bear in mind that the cache must at all - times be writable by the user which httpd is running as. This is in - stark contrast to the usually recommended situation of maintaining - all content unwritable by the Apache user.
- -If the Apache user is compromised, for example through a flaw in
- a CGI process, it is possible that the cache may be targeted. When
- using
This presents a somewhat elevated risk in comparison to the other
- types of attack it is possible to make as the Apache user. If you are
- using
When running httpd as a caching proxy server, there is also the - potential for so-called cache poisoning. Cache Poisoning is a broad - term for attacks in which an attacker causes the proxy server to - retrieve incorrect (and usually undesirable) content from the backend. -
- -For example if the DNS servers used by your system running - httpd - are vulnerable to DNS cache poisoning, an attacker may be able to control - where httpd connects to when requesting content from the origin server. - Another example is so-called HTTP request-smuggling attacks.
- -This document is not the correct place for an in-depth discussion - of HTTP request smuggling (instead, try your favourite search engine) - however it is important to be aware that it is possible to make - a series of requests, and to exploit a vulnerability on an origin - webserver such that the attacker can entirely control the content - retrieved by the proxy.
-The
The act of opening a file can itself be a source of delay, particularly - on network filesystems. By maintaining a cache of open file descriptors - for commonly served files, httpd can avoid this delay. Currently - httpd - provides one implementation of File-Handle Caching.
- -The most basic form of caching present in httpd is the file-handle
- caching provided by
The
-
Typically the module will be configured as so;
If you intend to cache a large number of files in this manner, you - must ensure that your operating system's limit for the number of open - files is set appropriately.
- -Although using
If the file is removed while httpd is running, it will continue - to maintain an open file descriptor and serve the file as it was when - httpd was started. This usually also means that although the file - will have been deleted, and not show up on the filesystem, extra free - space will not be recovered until httpd is stopped and the file - descriptor closed.
-Serving directly from system memory is universally the fastest method - of serving content. Reading files from a disk controller or, even worse, - from a remote network is orders of magnitude slower. Disk controllers - usually involve physical processes, and network access is limited by - your available bandwidth. Memory access on the other hand can take mere - nano-seconds.
- -System memory isn't cheap though, byte for byte it's by far the most - expensive type of storage and it's important to ensure that it is used - efficiently. By caching files in memory you decrease the amount of - memory available on the system. As we'll see, in the case of operating - system caching, this is not so much of an issue, but when using - httpd's own in-memory caching it is important to make sure that you - do not allocate too much memory to a cache. Otherwise the system - will be forced to swap out memory, which will likely degrade - performance.
- -Almost all modern operating systems cache file-data in memory managed - directly by the kernel. This is a powerful feature, and for the most - part operating systems get it right. For example, on Linux, let's look at - the difference in the time it takes to read a file for the first time - and the second time;
- --colm@coroebus:~$ time cat testfile > /dev/null -real 0m0.065s -user 0m0.000s -sys 0m0.001s -colm@coroebus:~$ time cat testfile > /dev/null -real 0m0.003s -user 0m0.003s -sys 0m0.000s-
Even for this small file, there is a huge difference in the amount - of time it takes to read the file. This is because the kernel has cached - the file contents in memory.
- -By ensuring there is "spare" memory on your system, you can ensure - that more and more file-contents will be stored in this cache. This - can be a very efficient means of in-memory caching, and involves no - extra configuration of httpd at all.
- -Additionally, because the operating system knows when files are - deleted or modified, it can automatically remove file contents from the - cache when necessary. This is a big advantage over httpd's in-memory - caching which has no way of knowing when a file has changed.
-Despite the performance and advantages of automatic operating system - caching there are some circumstances in which in-memory caching may be - better performed by httpd.
- -As with the
-
The
Typically the module will be configured as so;
- -Importantly, as the cached files are locally stored, operating system - in-memory caching will typically be applied to their access also. So - although the files are stored on disk, if they are frequently accessed - it is likely the operating system will ensure that they are actually - served from memory.
+Importantly, as the cached files are locally stored, operating system + in-memory caching will typically be applied to their access also. So + although the files are stored on disk, if they are frequently accessed + it is likely the operating system will ensure that they are actually + served from memory.
+ +To store items in the cache,
Each character may be any one of 64-different characters, which mean
that overall there are 64^22 possible hashes. For example, a URL might
@@ -634,14 +504,14 @@ CacheDirLength 1
Although The Instead, provided with httpd is the htcacheclean tool which, as the name
- suggests, allows you to clean the cache periodically. Determining
- how frequently to run htcacheclean tool which allows you
+ to clean the cache periodically. Determining how frequently to run htcacheclean and what target size to
use for the cache is somewhat complex and trial and error may be needed to
select optimal values.
It is also recommended that an appropriate "nice" level is chosen for + htcacheclean so that the tool does not cause excessive disk io while the + server is running.
The Apache HTTP server offers a low level shared object cache for
+ caching information such as SSL sessions, or authentication credentials,
+ within the socache interface. Additional modules are provided for each implementation, offering the
+ following backends: The The On platforms where a filesystem might be slow, or where file
+ handles are expensive, the option exists to pre-load files into
+ memory on startup. On systems where opening files is slow, the option exists to
+ open the file on startup and cache the file handle. These
+ options can help on systems where access to static files is
+ slow. The act of opening a file can itself be a source of delay, particularly
+ on network filesystems. By maintaining a cache of open file descriptors
+ for commonly served files, httpd can avoid this delay. Currently httpd
+ provides one implementation of File-Handle Caching. The most basic form of caching present in httpd is the file-handle
+ caching provided by The
+ If you intend to cache a large number of files in this manner, you
+ must ensure that your operating system's limit for the number of open
+ files is set appropriately. Although using If the file is removed while httpd is running, it will continue
+ to maintain an open file descriptor and serve the file as it was when
+ httpd was started. This usually also means that although the file
+ will have been deleted, and not show up on the filesystem, extra free
+ space will not be recovered until httpd is stopped and the file
+ descriptor closed. Serving directly from system memory is universally the fastest method
+ of serving content. Reading files from a disk controller or, even worse,
+ from a remote network is orders of magnitude slower. Disk controllers
+ usually involve physical processes, and network access is limited by
+ your available bandwidth. Memory access on the other hand can take mere
+ nano-seconds. System memory isn't cheap though, byte for byte it's by far the most
+ expensive type of storage and it's important to ensure that it is used
+ efficiently. By caching files in memory you decrease the amount of
+ memory available on the system. As we'll see, in the case of operating
+ system caching, this is not so much of an issue, but when using
+ httpd's own in-memory caching it is important to make sure that you
+ do not allocate too much memory to a cache. Otherwise the system
+ will be forced to swap out memory, which will likely degrade
+ performance. Almost all modern operating systems cache file-data in memory managed
+ directly by the kernel. This is a powerful feature, and for the most
+ part operating systems get it right. For example, on Linux, let's look at
+ the difference in the time it takes to read a file for the first time
+ and the second time; Even for this small file, there is a huge difference in the amount
+ of time it takes to read the file. This is because the kernel has cached
+ the file contents in memory. By ensuring there is "spare" memory on your system, you can ensure
+ that more and more file-contents will be stored in this cache. This
+ can be a very efficient means of in-memory caching, and involves no
+ extra configuration of httpd at all. Additionally, because the operating system knows when files are
+ deleted or modified, it can automatically remove file contents from the
+ cache when necessary. This is a big advantage over httpd's in-memory
+ caching which has no way of knowing when a file has changed. Despite the performance and advantages of automatic operating system
+ caching there are some circumstances in which in-memory caching may be
+ better performed by httpd. As with the
+ The Using As traversing a filesystem hierarchy to examine potential
+ If, for example, your configuration permits access to a resource by IP
+ address you should ensure that this content is not cached. You can do this
+ by using the When the As requests to end-users can be served from the cache, the cache
+ itself can become a target for those wishing to deface or interfere with
+ content. It is important to bear in mind that the cache must at all
+ times be writable by the user which httpd is running as. This is in
+ stark contrast to the usually recommended situation of maintaining
+ all content unwritable by the Apache user. If the Apache user is compromised, for example through a flaw in
+ a CGI process, it is possible that the cache may be targeted. When
+ using This presents a somewhat elevated risk in comparison to the other
+ types of attack it is possible to make as the Apache user. If you are
+ using When running httpd as a caching proxy server, there is also the
+ potential for so-called cache poisoning. Cache Poisoning is a broad
+ term for attacks in which an attacker causes the proxy server to
+ retrieve incorrect (and usually undesirable) content from the origin
+ server. For example if the DNS servers used by your system running httpd
+ are vulnerable to DNS cache poisoning, an attacker may be able to control
+ where httpd connects to when requesting content from the origin server.
+ Another example is so-called HTTP request-smuggling attacks. This document is not the correct place for an in-depth discussion
+ of HTTP request smuggling (instead, try your favourite search engine)
+ however it is important to be aware that it is possible to make
+ a series of requests, and to exploit a vulnerability on an origin
+ webserver such that the attacker can entirely control the content
+ retrieved by the proxy. The Vary mechanism allows multiple variants of the same URL to be
+ cached side by side. Depending on header values provided by the client,
+ the cache will select the correct variant to return to the client. This
+ mechanism can become a problem when an attempt is made to vary on a
+ header that is known to contain a wide range of possible values under
+ normal use, for example the In other cases, there may be a need to change the URL of a particular
+ resource on every request, usually by adding a "cachebuster" string to
+ the URL. If this content is declared cacheable by a server for a
+ significant freshness lifetime, these entries can crowd out
+ legitimate entries in a cache. While
+
+
+
+ socache interface
+ to provide a session cache and a stapling cache.
+colm@coroebus:~$ time cat testfile > /dev/null
+real 0m0.065s
+user 0m0.000s
+sys 0m0.001s
+colm@coroebus:~$ time cat testfile > /dev/null
+real 0m0.003s
+user 0m0.003s
+sys 0m0.000s
+ On is very much like having a caching reverse-proxy bolted
+ to the front of the server. Requests will be served by the caching module
+ unless it determines that the origin server should be queried just as an
+ external cache would, and this drastically changes the security model of
+ httpd..htaccess files would be a very expensive operation,
+ partially defeating the point of caching (to speed up requests),
+ Off, the full set of request processing
+ phases are executed and the security model remains unchanged.User-Agent header. Depending
+ on the popularity of the particular web site thousands or millions of
+ duplicate cache entries could be created for the same URL, crowding
+ out other entries in the cache.