From: Kazu Hirata <kazu@codesourcery.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:34:08 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: * decl2.c, init.c, typeck.c: Fix comment typos.
X-Git-Tag: releases/gcc-4.1.0~1034
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=dd36d4e1da63d53dadd70ab711422ff925c6ee45;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

* decl2.c, init.c, typeck.c: Fix comment typos.

From-SVN: r106533
---

diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
index 0e7d5e935ba5..191bedf8690b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2005-11-05  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@codesourcery.com>
+
+	* decl2.c, init.c, typeck.c: Fix comment typos.
+
 2005-11-04  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>
 
 	PR c++/22487
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl2.c b/gcc/cp/decl2.c
index 70ca017d9e44..77ac5f7ae9ea 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl2.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.c
@@ -2320,7 +2320,7 @@ get_priority_info (int priority)
 	((!DECL_HAS_INIT_PRIORITY_P (decl) || DECL_INIT_PRIORITY (decl) == 0) \
 	 ? DEFAULT_INIT_PRIORITY : DECL_INIT_PRIORITY (decl))
 
-/* Wether a DECL needs a guard to protect it against multiple
+/* Whether a DECL needs a guard to protect it against multiple
    initialization.  */
 
 #define NEEDS_GUARD_P(decl) (TREE_PUBLIC (decl) && (DECL_COMMON (decl)      \
diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.c b/gcc/cp/init.c
index 1ff2fd7be7be..f43846719e58 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/init.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/init.c
@@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@ constant_value_1 (tree decl, bool integral_p)
 	      : (!TREE_CONSTANT (init)
 		 /* Do not return an aggregate constant (of which
 		    string literals are a special case), as we do not
-		    want to make inadvertant copies of such entities,
+		    want to make inadvertent copies of such entities,
 		    and we must be sure that their addresses are the
 		    same everywhere.  */
 		 || TREE_CODE (init) == CONSTRUCTOR
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
index a7edfc12e7f5..b9be6fd694ff 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ check_template_keyword (tree decl)
      DR 228 removed the restriction that the template be a member
      template.  
      
-     DR 96, if accepted would add the further restriction that explcit
+     DR 96, if accepted would add the further restriction that explicit
      template arguments must be provided if the template keyword is
      used, but, as of 2005-10-16, that DR is still in "drafting".  If
      this DR is accepted, then the semantic checks here can be