From: Niels Möller Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:54:35 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Comment fix. X-Git-Tag: nettle_2.2_release_20110711~47 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=fe7695d1013204eb49985d4edaa3dd41ad230a6f;p=thirdparty%2Fnettle.git Comment fix. Rev: nettle/serpent-encrypt.c:1.13 --- diff --git a/serpent-encrypt.c b/serpent-encrypt.c index 03ba0de0..90878bde 100644 --- a/serpent-encrypt.c +++ b/serpent-encrypt.c @@ -66,10 +66,6 @@ (GPL), although some comments in the code still say otherwise. You are welcome to use Serpent for any application." */ -/* FIXME: Except when used within the key schedule, the inputs are not - used after the substitution, and hence we could allow them to be - destroyed. Can this freedom be used to optimize the sboxes? */ - /* S0: 3 8 15 1 10 6 5 11 14 13 4 2 7 0 9 12 */ /* Could easily let y0, y1 overlap with x0, x1, and possibly also x2 and y2 */ #define SBOX0(x0, x1, x2, x3, y0, y1, y2, y3) \ @@ -98,24 +94,24 @@ /* S1: 15 12 2 7 9 0 5 10 1 11 14 8 6 13 3 4 */ /* Original single-assignment form: - t01 = x0 | x3; 0 - t02 = x2 ^ x3; 0 - t03 = ~ x1; 0 - t04 = x0 ^ x2; 0 - t05 = x0 | t03; 0 - t06 = x3 & t04; 0 - t07 = t01 & t02; 0 - t08 = x1 | t06; 0 - y2 = t02 ^ t05; 0 - t10 = t07 ^ t08; 0 - t11 = t01 ^ t10; 0 - t12 = y2 ^ t11; 0 - t13 = x1 & x3; 0 + t01 = x0 | x3; + t02 = x2 ^ x3; + t03 = ~ x1; + t04 = x0 ^ x2; + t05 = x0 | t03; + t06 = x3 & t04; + t07 = t01 & t02; + t08 = x1 | t06; + y2 = t02 ^ t05; + t10 = t07 ^ t08; + t11 = t01 ^ t10; + t12 = y2 ^ t11; + t13 = x1 & x3; y3 = ~ t10; - y1 = t13 ^ t12; 0 - t16 = t10 | y1; 0 - t17 = t05 & t16; 0 - y0 = x2 ^ t17; 0 + y1 = t13 ^ t12; + t16 = t10 | y1; + t17 = t05 & t16; + y0 = x2 ^ t17; */ #define SBOX1(x0, x1, x2, x3, y0, y1, y2, y3) \ do { \