Nick Mathewson [Wed, 6 May 2020 14:45:48 +0000 (10:45 -0400)]
Use __attribute__((fallthrough)) rather than magic GCC comments.
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
Nick Mathewson [Wed, 6 May 2020 14:45:48 +0000 (10:45 -0400)]
Use __attribute__((fallthrough)) rather than magic GCC comments.
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
Nick Mathewson [Wed, 6 May 2020 14:45:48 +0000 (10:45 -0400)]
Use __attribute__((fallthrough)) rather than magic GCC comments.
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
Nick Mathewson [Wed, 6 May 2020 14:45:48 +0000 (10:45 -0400)]
Use __attribute__((fallthrough)) rather than magic GCC comments.
GCC added an implicit-fallthrough warning a while back, where it
would complain if you had a nontrivial "case:" block that didn't end
with break, return, or something like that. Clang recently added
the same thing.
GCC, however, would let you annotate a fall-through as intended by
any of various magic "/* fall through */" comments. Clang, however,
only seems to like "__attribute__((fallthrough))". Fortunately, GCC
accepts that too.
A previous commit in this branch defined a FALLTHROUGH macro to do
the right thing if GNUC is defined; here we replace all of our "fall
through" comments with uses of that macro.
This is an automated commit, made with the following perl one-liner:
Nick Mathewson [Wed, 6 May 2020 14:24:21 +0000 (10:24 -0400)]
Add a fallthrough macro.
This macro defers to __attribute__((fallthrough)) on GCC (and
clang). Previously we had been using GCC's magic /* fallthrough */
comments, but clang very sensibly doesn't accept those.
Since not all compiler recognize it, we only define it when our
configure script detects that it works.
Nick Mathewson [Fri, 1 May 2020 03:04:56 +0000 (23:04 -0400)]
Fix a GCC 10.0.1 compilation error.
Do not try to stuff "HS_DESC_DECODE_GENERIC_ERROR" (-1) into a
socks5_reply_status_t (enum). It doesn't actually make sense, and
isn't one of our documented extensions.
(This can only happen on a nonfatal assertion that we haven't seen,
so it probably isn't happening in practice.)
Fixes another case of bug 34077; bugfix on 0.4.3.1-alpha.
hs-v3: Don't allow registration of an all-zeroes client auth key.
The client auth protocol allows attacker-controlled x25519 private keys being
passed around, which allows an attacker to potentially trigger the all-zeroes
assert for client_auth_sk in hs_descriptor.c:decrypt_descriptor_cookie().
We fixed that by making sure that an all-zeroes client auth key will not be
used.
There are no guidelines for validating x25519 private keys, and the assert was
there as a sanity check for code flow issues (we don't want to enter that
function with an unitialized key if client auth is being used). To avoid such
crashes in the future, we also changed the assert to a BUG-and-err.
David Goulet [Tue, 7 Apr 2020 13:04:01 +0000 (09:04 -0400)]
client: Revert setting PreferIPv6 on by default
This change broke torsocks that by default is expecting an IPv4 for hostname
resolution because it can't ask tor for a specific IP version with the SOCKS5
extension.
PreferIPv6 made it that sometimes the IPv6 could be returned to torsocks that
was expecting an IPv4.
Torsocks is probably a very unique case because the runtime flow is that it
hijacks DNS resolution (ex: getaddrinfo()), gets an IP and then sends it back
for the connect() to happen.
The libc has DNS resolution functions that allows the caller to request a
specific INET family but torsocks can't tell tor to resolve the hostname only
to an IPv4 or IPv6 and thus by default fallsback to IPv4.
Reverting this change into 0.4.3.x series but we'll keep it in the 0.4.4.x
series in the hope that we add this SOCKS5 extension to tor for DNS resolution
and then change torsocks to use that.
Fixes #33804
Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@torproject.org>
Avoid conflicts between the fake sockets in tor's unit tests, and real
file descriptors. Resolves issues running unit tests with GitHub
Actions, where the process that embeds or launches the tests has
already opened a large number of file descriptors.
teor [Thu, 19 Mar 2020 07:35:49 +0000 (17:35 +1000)]
Appveyor: Copy required DLLs to test and app
Copy required DLLs to test and app, before running tor's tests.
This ensures that tor.exe and test*.exe use the correct version of each
DLL. This fix is not required, but we hope it will avoid DLL search
issues in future.
Nick Mathewson [Thu, 19 Mar 2020 19:25:11 +0000 (15:25 -0400)]
Add a TOR_SKIP_TESTCASES environment variable for suppressing tests.
For example, "TOR_SKIP_TESTCASES=crypto/.. ./src/test/test" will run
the tests and suppress all the "crypto/" tests. You could get the
same effect by running "./src/test/test :crypto/..", but that can be
harder to arrange from CI.
projects / thirdparty / tor.git / log
