From 16c43a56b79e2c3220b043236369a129d508c65a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2025 22:28:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] rust: kbuild: treat `build_error` and `rustdoc` as kernel objects Even if normally `build_error` isn't a kernel object, it should still be treated as such so that we pass the same flags. Similarly, `rustdoc` targets are never kernel objects, but we need to treat them as such. Otherwise, starting with Rust 1.91.0 (released 2025-10-30), `rustc` will complain about missing sanitizer flags since `-Zsanitizer` is a target modifier too [1]: error: mixing `-Zsanitizer` will cause an ABI mismatch in crate `build_error` --> rust/build_error.rs:3:1 | 3 | //! Build-time error. | ^ | = help: the `-Zsanitizer` flag modifies the ABI so Rust crates compiled with different values of this flag cannot be used together safely = note: unset `-Zsanitizer` in this crate is incompatible with `-Zsanitizer=kernel-address` in dependency `core` = help: set `-Zsanitizer=kernel-address` in this crate or unset `-Zsanitizer` in `core` = help: if you are sure this will not cause problems, you may use `-Cunsafe-allow-abi-mismatch=sanitizer` to silence this error Thus explicitly mark them as kernel objects. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs). Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138736 [1] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251102212853.1505384-1-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda --- rust/Makefile | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/rust/Makefile b/rust/Makefile index 23c7ae905bd2f..a9fb9354b6593 100644 --- a/rust/Makefile +++ b/rust/Makefile @@ -127,9 +127,14 @@ rustdoc-core: private rustc_target_flags = --edition=$(core-edition) $(core-cfgs rustdoc-core: $(RUST_LIB_SRC)/core/src/lib.rs rustdoc-clean FORCE +$(call if_changed,rustdoc) +# Even if `rustdoc` targets are not kernel objects, they should still be +# treated as such so that we pass the same flags. Otherwise, for instance, +# `rustdoc` will complain about missing sanitizer flags causing an ABI mismatch. +rustdoc-compiler_builtins: private is-kernel-object := y rustdoc-compiler_builtins: $(src)/compiler_builtins.rs rustdoc-core FORCE +$(call if_changed,rustdoc) +rustdoc-ffi: private is-kernel-object := y rustdoc-ffi: $(src)/ffi.rs rustdoc-core FORCE +$(call if_changed,rustdoc) @@ -147,6 +152,7 @@ rustdoc-pin_init: $(src)/pin-init/src/lib.rs rustdoc-pin_init_internal \ rustdoc-macros FORCE +$(call if_changed,rustdoc) +rustdoc-kernel: private is-kernel-object := y rustdoc-kernel: private rustc_target_flags = --extern ffi --extern pin_init \ --extern build_error --extern macros \ --extern bindings --extern uapi @@ -522,6 +528,10 @@ $(obj)/pin_init.o: $(src)/pin-init/src/lib.rs $(obj)/compiler_builtins.o \ $(obj)/$(libpin_init_internal_name) $(obj)/$(libmacros_name) FORCE +$(call if_changed_rule,rustc_library) +# Even if normally `build_error` is not a kernel object, it should still be +# treated as such so that we pass the same flags. Otherwise, for instance, +# `rustc` will complain about missing sanitizer flags causing an ABI mismatch. +$(obj)/build_error.o: private is-kernel-object := y $(obj)/build_error.o: private skip_gendwarfksyms = 1 $(obj)/build_error.o: $(src)/build_error.rs $(obj)/compiler_builtins.o FORCE +$(call if_changed_rule,rustc_library) -- 2.47.3