From 171c04728993bac01666994cacaf4d840be97801 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 12:41:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] ocfs2: remove unnecessary NULL check in ocfs2_grab_folios()

Smatch complains that checking "folios" for NULL doesn't make sense
because it has already been dereferenced at this point.  Really passing a
NULL "folios" pointer to ocfs2_grab_folios() doesn't make sense, and
fortunately none of the callers do that.  Delete the unnecessary NULL
check.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aKRG39hyvDJcN2G7@stanley.mountain
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <mark.tinguely@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
 fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
index 821cb7874685e..162711cc5b201 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/alloc.c
@@ -6928,8 +6928,7 @@ static int ocfs2_grab_folios(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end,
 
 out:
 	if (ret != 0) {
-		if (folios)
-			ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
+		ocfs2_unlock_and_free_folios(folios, numfolios);
 		numfolios = 0;
 	}
 
-- 
2.47.3