From 2ad5848e5035afc4750147900d11ba647835342b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew MacIntyre Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 22:27:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] backport v1.216: add support for another DB library naming convention \n(FreeBSD ports) - patch #1146231 --- setup.py | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py index 6713a9c26473..1a58619b7222 100644 --- a/setup.py +++ b/setup.py @@ -569,7 +569,9 @@ class PyBuildExt(build_ext): # XXX should we -ever- look for a dbX name? Do any # systems really not name their library by version and # symlink to more general names? - for dblib in (('db-%d.%d' % db_ver), ('db%d' % db_ver[0])): + for dblib in (('db-%d.%d' % db_ver), + ('db%d%d' % db_ver), + ('db%d' % db_ver[0])): dblib_file = self.compiler.find_library_file( db_dirs_to_check + lib_dirs, dblib ) if dblib_file: -- 2.47.3