From 461540b85af6e475b1be414cc28455de5663fc0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Michael W. Hudson" Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:20:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Backport of akuchling's checkin of 1.10: Suggested by Pete Shinners: treat .m and .mm files as source code. Question for Jack Jansen: is this reasonable? Candidate for 2.2 release branch (if Jack thinks it's OK). Not sure how this wasn't on the branch already, seeing as I thought it went into 2.2. --- Lib/distutils/extension.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Lib/distutils/extension.py b/Lib/distutils/extension.py index fbae7c5226af..a31ccbce8da5 100644 --- a/Lib/distutils/extension.py +++ b/Lib/distutils/extension.py @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ def read_setup_file (filename): suffix = os.path.splitext(word)[1] switch = word[0:2] ; value = word[2:] - if suffix in (".c", ".cc", ".cpp", ".cxx", ".c++"): + if suffix in (".c", ".cc", ".cpp", ".cxx", ".c++", ".m", ".mm"): # hmm, should we do something about C vs. C++ sources? # or leave it up to the CCompiler implementation to # worry about? -- 2.47.3