From 4b496e50ee4f6bd8256d082a85fc027a7eaa45cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Masatake YAMATO Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 00:48:41 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] lsfd: fix wrongly checked flag constants The definition of O_FOLLOW was checked. However, it was a typo of O_NOFOLLOW. The definition of O_FASYNC was checked. However, it was a typo of FASYNC. Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO --- misc-utils/lsfd-decode-file-flags.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/misc-utils/lsfd-decode-file-flags.c b/misc-utils/lsfd-decode-file-flags.c index b958797549..b317820393 100644 --- a/misc-utils/lsfd-decode-file-flags.c +++ b/misc-utils/lsfd-decode-file-flags.c @@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ void lsfd_decode_file_flags(struct ul_buffer *buf, int flags) SET_FLAG(DSYNC,dsync); #endif -#ifdef O_FASYNC - SET_FLAG(FASYNC,fasync); +#ifdef FASYNC + SET_FLAG_FULL(FASYNC,fasync); #endif #ifdef O_DIRECT @@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ void lsfd_decode_file_flags(struct ul_buffer *buf, int flags) SET_FLAG(DIRECTORY,directory); #endif -#ifdef O_FOLLOW - SET_FLAG(FOLLOW,follow); +#ifdef O_NOFOLLOW + SET_FLAG(NOFOLLOW,nofollow); #endif #ifdef O_NOATIME -- 2.47.3