From 53f558decc4cb79b72d5bd26c061de03d880cb91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Mathewson Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:07:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] r16928@tombo: nickm | 2008-07-11 17:07:36 -0400 It seems that fixing one spelling error always means that somebody is about to tell me about another. Fix a second spelling error in the risks section of 150. svn:r15848 --- doc/spec/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/spec/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt b/doc/spec/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt index 3d2b1382e9..f90d8a25fc 100644 --- a/doc/spec/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt +++ b/doc/spec/proposals/150-exclude-exit-nodes.txt @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Risks: Use of this option can make users partitionable under certain attack assumptions. However, ExitNodes already creates this possibility, - so there isn't much increased risk in ExcludeExitNods. + so there isn't much increased risk in ExcludeExitNodes. We should still encourage people who exclude an exit node because of bad behavior to report it instead of just adding it to their -- 2.47.3