From 73452d34a16040962d3e8f66f81fce97b796abbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Parker Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:32:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] It's possible for sub->owner to be NULL here if you cancel the call immediately after/during sending a digit. git-svn-id: https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4@76174 65c4cc65-6c06-0410-ace0-fbb531ad65f3 --- channels/chan_skinny.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/channels/chan_skinny.c b/channels/chan_skinny.c index 4571c62dd0..82f01b70d3 100644 --- a/channels/chan_skinny.c +++ b/channels/chan_skinny.c @@ -4160,7 +4160,7 @@ static int handle_message(struct skinny_req *req, struct skinnysession *s) sub = find_subchannel_by_instance_reference(d, lineInstance, callReference); - if (sub && (sub->owner->_state < AST_STATE_UP)) { + if (sub && (sub->owner && sub->owner->_state < AST_STATE_UP)) { char dgt; int digit = letohl(req->data.keypad.button); size_t len; -- 2.47.3