From 7c5bb17398d3426ba573f1f4e93a0a0630e0c657 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roger Dingledine Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:41:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] two steps forward, one step back svn:r14344 --- doc/TODO | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/TODO b/doc/TODO index fad8d71acd..e41f8e70c2 100644 --- a/doc/TODO +++ b/doc/TODO @@ -236,8 +236,9 @@ For 0.2.1.x: - Proposals to write: - Do we want to maintain our own set of entryguards that we use as next hop after the bridge? - - Add an 'exit-address' line in the descriptor for servers that exit + X Add an 'exit-address' line in the descriptor for servers that exit from something that isn't their published address. + [I think tordnsel solved this. -RD] - Proposal to supersede 117 by adding IPv6 support for exits and entries. - Internal code support for ipv6: o Clone ipv6 functions (inet_ntop, inet_pton) where they don't exist. @@ -268,6 +269,12 @@ For 0.2.1.x: - Patch our tor.spec rpm package so it knows where to put the fallback consensus file. - Something for bug 469, to limit connections per IP. + - Put bandwidth weights in the networkstatus? So clients get weight + their choices even before they have the descriptors; and so + authorities can put in more accurate numbers in the future. + - Map out the process of bootstrapping, break it into status events, + spec those events. Also, map out the ways where we can realize that + bootstrapping is *failing*, and include those. * - Tiny designs to write: - Better estimate of clock skew; has anonymity implications. Clients -- 2.47.3