From d50c55bd435a5c338665da1cb83df88b49b96eff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yu Watanabe Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 23:32:21 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] udev: do not ignore -ENOENT from sd_device_get_devname() for block device We already checked that the sd_device object 'dev' is for a whole block device. So, -ENOENT should not be triggeered here, and if it is, there exists something spurious. Hence we should not ignore the failure. --- src/udev/udevd.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/udev/udevd.c b/src/udev/udevd.c index 9900a9363ea..5ea197c1c48 100644 --- a/src/udev/udevd.c +++ b/src/udev/udevd.c @@ -495,8 +495,6 @@ static int device_get_whole_disk(sd_device *dev, sd_device **ret_device, const c return log_device_debug_errno(dev, r, "Failed to get whole disk device: %m"); r = sd_device_get_devname(dev, &val); - if (r == -ENOENT) - goto irrelevant; if (r < 0) return log_device_debug_errno(dev, r, "Failed to get devname: %m"); -- 2.47.3