drop 4 patches based on RC review feedback
Dropped patches:
- "bpf, riscv: Remove redundant bpf_flush_icache() after pack allocator finalize"
Queues: 6.12, 6.6
Reason: build break on riscv — removes the inline bpf_flush_icache()
definition but the prerequisite (
6798668ab195, "riscv, bpf: Remove
duplicated bpf_flush_icache()") is missing in 6.12/6.6, leaving an
undefined caller in arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c.
Report: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/
b8ef921f-e2ab-4cfb-b75c-
89e4277214cf@oracle.com/
- "fuse: new work queue to periodically invalidate expired dentries"
Queues: 6.18
Reason: FUSE maintainer Miklos Szeredi NAK — "This is not stable
material, and I don't think the dependency is real."
Report: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CAOssrKcqmVW3kJ131tRF3LCJVQUtdRB31B5HENDfpgrq6r=jEA@mail.gmail.com/
- "dcache: export shrink_dentry_list() and add new helper d_dispose_if_unused()" [dependency]
Queues: 6.18
Reason: only present to support the dropped workqueue patch (Stable-dep-of:
5a6baf204610).
- "fuse: fix uninit-value in fuse_dentry_revalidate()" [dependency]
Queues: 6.18
Reason: Stable-dep-of relationship to dropped workqueue patch; per
maintainer the dependency isn't real and a trivial conflict resolution
is the correct path — fix will be reposted directly to stable.
- "fuse: fix race when disposing stale dentries" [dependency]
Queues: 6.18
Reason: Fixes:
ab84ad597386 — cannot apply without the dropped
workqueue patch (fuse_dentry_tree_work doesn't exist).
- "fuse: make sure dentry is evicted if stale" [dependency]
Queues: 6.18
Reason: Fixes:
ab84ad597386 — modifies fuse_dentry_tree_work()
introduced by the dropped workqueue patch.
- "i3c: master: Fix error codes at send_ccc_cmd"
Queues: 7.0, 6.18, 6.12, 6.6, 6.1, 5.15, 5.10
Reason: prerequisite patches called out in the commit message
("Move rstdaa/entdaa/bus_init error suppression") are not all
backported, so the semantics of the change differ from upstream.
Report: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/
a6d725bd-9ed4-4328-b2ba-
078f658fd8b2@oracle.com/
- "fuse: fix premature writetrhough request for large folio"
Queues: 7.0, 6.18
Reason: Reviewed-by Joanne Koong (author of the parent commit that
introduced large-folio writethrough support) reports the bug is not
triggerable as fuse hasn't enabled large folios yet.
Report: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CAJnrk1bWJfT5hswsJ3X5HMZ=XLz5MO3pYXg6WkuYYvZ6ccS0Nw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>