this was a bug that hadn't been noticed before, but 19447 added a test for
that condition and it caused test failures.
* PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
*/
-/* $Id: named.conf,v 1.2.2.2 2010/05/27 23:49:55 tbox Exp $ */
+/* $Id: named.conf,v 1.2.2.3 2010/07/11 01:18:17 each Exp $ */
controls { /* empty */ };
zone "grand.child7.utld" { type master; file "grand.child7.signed"; };
zone "grand.child8.utld" { type master; file "grand.child8.signed"; };
zone "grand.child9.utld" { type master; file "grand.child9.signed"; };
-zone "grand.child10.utld" { type master; file "grand.child.db.in"; };
+zone "grand.child10.utld" { type master; file "grand.child10.signed"; };
* PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
*/
-/* $Id: named.conf,v 1.35.32.2 2010/01/18 23:48:01 tbox Exp $ */
+/* $Id: named.conf,v 1.35.32.3 2010/07/11 01:18:17 each Exp $ */
// NS3
allow-update { any; };
};
-zone "mustbesecure.example" {
- type master;
- file "mustbesecure.example.db";
-};
-
zone "rfc2335.example" {
type slave;
masters { 10.53.0.2; };