cases this gives ccache a much higher cache hit rate\&.
.IP o
ccache can handle a much wider ranger of compiler options
-.IP o
-compilercache does much smarter token unification using a C
-lexer\&. This means that reformatting of source code is much more
-likely to result in a cache miss with ccache than with
-compilercache\&. I may add this in future, although it is perhaps
-debatable whether the much slower parsing is worth it\&.
Note however that ccache is a very new piece of code (as of March
2002) whereas Erik\&'s scripts have had more testing\&.
.PP
it() ccache can cache compiler output that includes warnings. In many
cases this gives ccache a much higher cache hit rate.
it() ccache can handle a much wider ranger of compiler options
-it() compilercache does much smarter token unification using a C
- lexer. This means that reformatting of source code is much more
- likely to result in a cache miss with ccache than with
- compilercache. I may add this in future, although it is perhaps
- debatable whether the much slower parsing is worth it.
)
Note however that ccache is a very new piece of code (as of March
2002) whereas Erik's scripts have had more testing.
<li > ccache can cache compiler output that includes warnings. In many
cases this gives ccache a much higher cache hit rate.
<li > ccache can handle a much wider ranger of compiler options
-<li > compilercache does much smarter token unification using a C
- lexer. This means that reformatting of source code is much more
- likely to result in a cache miss with ccache than with
- compilercache. I may add this in future, although it is perhaps
- debatable whether the much slower parsing is worth it.
</ul>
Note however that ccache is a very new piece of code (as of March
2002) whereas Erik's scripts have had more testing.